Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Netconnect Technology vs Deputy Commissioner (Works Contract) & Others: Kerala High Court Directs Disposal of Stay Petitions in KVAT Appeals Within Six Weeks and Keeps Recovery Proceedings in Abeyance Pending Decision
Facts of the CaseNetconnect Technology suffered two assessment orders, marked
as Ext.P1 and Ext.P1(a), for the assessment years 2016-17 and 2017-18
under the provisions of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act.The appendix to...
M/s. Kalyan Sarees vs Deputy Commissioner, State GST Department & Others – Kerala High Court Stays Recovery Pending Disposal of Stay Petition in Second Appeal under Kerala VAT Act, 2003
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, M/s. Kalyan Sarees, suffered an
order of assessment under the provisions of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act,
2003. The modified assessment order, referred to as Ext.P1, was issued for t...
Beni Madhaw Jha & Hema Jha vs State of Jharkhand & Anr. – Anticipatory Bail Granted in IPC Sections 406, 420, 467, 506/34 Case Involving Development Agreement, Outstanding Dues and GST Amount
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners, Beni Madhaw Jha and Hema
Jha, approached the High Court of Jharkhand apprehending arrest in
connection with Dhanbad P.S. Case No. 193 of 2022, arising from Complaint
Petition N...
Hitu Pradhan vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes & GST, Odisha & Others: Orissa High Court Disposes of GST Writ Petition as Withdrawn on Petitioner’s Memo Seeking Leave to Withdraw
Facts of the CaseHitu Pradhan filed W.P.(C) No. 9323 of 2022 before the High
Court of Orissa at Cuttack against the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes &
GST, Odisha and other opposite parties.The matter came before t...
Vinay Pratap Singh vs State of Haryana and Another – Section 156(3) CrPC Order Directing FIR Against Public Servants Set Aside for Absence of Prior Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act and Lack of Judicial Application of Mind
Facts of the
CaseThe High Court of Punjab and Haryana considered
four connected petitions challenging the order dated 3 July 2020 passed by the
learned Sessions Judge, Gurugram, in exercise of powers under Secti...
MMTC Limited vs Deputy Commissioner Sales Tax, Circle-II, Bhubaneswar & Another: Orissa High Court Recalls Order Dated 17.08.2022 and Restores W.P.(C) No. 2035 of 2013
Facts of the
CaseMMTC Limited filed CMAPL No. 548 of 2022 before the
High Court of Orissa at Cuttack against the Deputy Commissioner Sales Tax,
Circle-II, Bhubaneswar and another. The application related to an earlier...
M/s Steelmax Alloys Ltd. vs State Tax Officer & Others: Kerala High Court Protects Bank Guarantee from Invocation in Section 129 CGST/SGST Proceedings Until Two Months After Constitution of GST Appellate Tribunal; Section 112 Appeal Remedy Preserved
Facts of the CaseM/s Steelmax Alloys Ltd. was subjected to an order under
Section 129 of the CGST/SGST Act.During the pendency of the proceedings, the goods and
conveyance were released after the petitioner:
Furnishe...
G. Murugiah & Ors. vs South Indian Bank Limited & Anr. – Kerala High Court Directs DRT-I Ernakulam to List Securitisation Application Without Undue Delay; OP (DRT) Dismissed as Withdrawn with All Contentions Left Open
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners approached the High Court of Kerala
by filing OP (DRT) No. 403 of 2022 in connection with proceedings before the
Debts Recovery Tribunal, Ernakulam.The record shows that the petitioner...
M/s Jai Mateshwari Steels Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner, Uttarakhand State GST & Others — Confiscation Under Section 130 CGST Act Challenged Where Invoice and E-Way Bill Were Available; High Court Directs Early Consideration of Interim Relief
Facts of the
CaseM/s Jai Mateshwari Steels Pvt. Ltd. preferred two
Special Appeals against the orders dated 15 September 2022 passed by the
learned Single Judge in the connected writ petitions.The learned Single Judge...
M/s Jaysons Exports vs Union of India – Gujarat High Court Directs IGST Refund on Zero-Rated Exports with 9% Interest Despite Higher Drawback Claim | Section 16(3)(b) of IGST Act, Section 54 of CGST Act & Rule 96 of CGST Rules
Facts of the
CaseM/s Jaysons Exports, a partnership firm registered
under GST, was engaged in the export of goods including VT pumps, spindle,
flange, rubber bush nitrile and impeller to overseas buyers situated in Mo...