Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
M/s Royal Enterprises vs Union of India & Others – Patna High Court Allows GST Demand of Rs. 1.33 Crore with Statutory Interest to Be Paid in Six Equal Installments; DRC-13 Bank Account Attachment and Third-Party Recovery Suspended | Section 80 and Section 79 of GST Act
Facts of the CaseM/s Royal Enterprises, through its proprietor Pawan Kumar
Mishra, approached the Patna High Court challenging coercive GST recovery
proceedings initiated pursuant to a demand reflected in FORM GST DRC-...
Raja Mohammed vs District Collector & Ors. – Madras High Court Closes Article 226 Writ Challenge to Panchayat Order on House Tax Receipt After Withdrawal; Liberty Granted to Apply Before Appropriate Authority
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Raja Mohammed, approached the Madurai
Bench of the Madras High Court by filing W.P.(MD) No. 21488 of 2022 under Article
226 of the Constitution of India.The respondents were:
The
...
M/s Hariom Mines and Minerals vs Union of India & Ors. – Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Challenge to GST Demand on Mining Royalty Following Sudarshan Lal Gupta Case; Declines Different View Despite Pending Supreme Court Proceedings
Facts of the CaseM/s Hariom Mines and Minerals, through its partner Mr.
Hemendra Kalal, filed a writ petition before the Rajasthan High Court at
Jodhpur challenging the impugned orders/notice issued by the respondent
...
M/s Singer India Limited vs M/s Planman HR Private Limited & Ors. – Delhi High Court Refers Commercial Payment Dispute to DIAC Arbitration; Arbitration Clause Cannot Be Invoked Against Former Directors/CEO Absent Privity of Contract | Section 11, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Facts of the CaseM/s Singer India Limited, the petitioner, entered into an
agreement dated 13 October 2015 with M/s Planman HR Private Limited
for providing qualified, competent, reliable and experienced personnel to
...
Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, J&K Jammu vs M/s Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. – J&K and Ladakh High Court Dismisses Excise Appeal as Squarely Covered by 23 May 2022 Judgment in CEA No. 10/2020 and Connected Appeals
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, J&K
Jammu, filed CEA No. 262/2022 before the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and
Ladakh at Jammu against M/s Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd., IGC S...
Adonex Pharmaceutical Private Limited vs State of Bihar — GST Registration Restoration Application to Be Decided on Merits Without Limitation Bar Under Section 29 of GST Act
Facts of the
CaseAdonex Pharmaceutical Private Limited approached
the Patna High Court challenging the order-in-appeal dated 08.09.2022 passed in
Appeal No. ARN-AD100822004755G by the Additional Commissioner of State ...
M/s. Bikram Enterprises vs Additional Commissioner (Appeals), CGST, CX & Customs, Bhubaneswar & Another — Delay under Proviso to Rule 23 of CGST Rules Condoned; GST Portal Directed to Be Opened for Filing Return Subject to Payment of Tax, Interest, Late Fee and Penalty
Facts of the
CaseM/s. Bikram Enterprises approached the High Court
of Orissa in W.P.(C) No. 25343 of 2022. The matter concerned delay on the part
of the Petitioner in invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Central Goo...
M/s. Capital Enterprisers vs Union of India & Others: Orissa High Court Disposes TRAN-1/TRAN-2 Writ Petition as Not Pressed in View of Filco Trade Centre Relief and Circular No. 180/12/2022-GST
Facts of the
CaseM/s. Capital Enterprisers filed W.P.(C) No. 34629
of 2020 before the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack seeking reliefs in relation
to the transitional credit mechanism under GST.During the hearing, lear...
Indo Electricals vs Deputy Commissioner — GST Assessment Order Quashed for Failure to Grant Personal Hearing and Improper Service of Hearing Notice
Facts of the
Case
Indo Electricals, the petitioner, approached the Kerala High Court
challenging the assessment order marked as Ext.P6 for the assessment year
2017–2018 under the State Goods and Services...
Sampath Singh vs Registrar, Debts Recovery Tribunal-II & Ors. – Kerala High Court Directs Registration of Section 17 SARFAESI Application; CJM Order Appointing Advocate Commissioner Not Mandatory Where Bona Fide Tenant Challenges Only Physical Possession
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner approached the High Court of Kerala
after being aggrieved by the failure of the Debts Recovery Tribunal-II,
Ernakulam, to number and take up his Securitisation Application filed under
...