Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,221,413
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Union of India, Ministry of Mines & Anr. vs Syed Ashfaq Ahmed & Ors. – Telangana High Court: Compassionate Appointment Cannot Be Directed After Long Efflux of Time | Article 226 of the Constitution of India & Section 151 CPC

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 142
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe dispute concerned a claim for compassionate appointment by the first respondent, Syed Ashfaq Ahmed. His father had died on 07.07.2003. Since his case was not considered for appointment on compass...

Mohammed Abdul Umair vs State of Telangana & Connected Matters – Telangana High Court Restrains Police Interference with Lawful Tobacco Business During Operation of Supreme Court Interim Orders | Article 226, COTPA 2003 & Section 151 CPC

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 102
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners were proprietors carrying on tobacco-product businesses under their respective trade concerns, namely Royal Agencies, Adeeb Traders Kaghaznagar, and Suresh Traders. They asserted that...

Beni Madhaw Jha & Hema Jha vs State of Jharkhand & Prem Prakash Gangesaria – Jharkhand High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Sections 406, 420, 467, 506/34 IPC Case Involving Development Agreement, Outstanding Dues and GST Amount Dispute

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 116
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, Beni Madhaw Jha and Hema Jha, approached the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi apprehending arrest in connection with Dhanbad P.S. Case No. 193 of 2022, arising from Complaint Petiti...

Vinay Pratap Singh vs State of Haryana and Another – Punjab & Haryana High Court: Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Investigation Against Public Servants Cannot Be Ordered Mechanically Without Required Sanction Under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 115
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe High Court dealt with four connected petitions challenging the order dated 3 July 2020 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Gurugram, in exercise of powers under Section 156(3) of the Code of Cri...

MMTC Limited vs Deputy Commissioner Sales Tax, Circle-II, Bhubaneswar & Another – Orissa High Court Recalls Dismissal Order Dated 17.08.2022 and Restores W.P.(C) No. 2035 of 2013 | CMAPL No. 548 of 2022

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 110
Read More »
Facts of the CaseMMTC Limited filed CMAPL No. 548 of 2022 before the Orissa High Court against the Deputy Commissioner Sales Tax, Circle-II, Bhubaneswar and another opposite party. The application related to an earlie...

G. Murugiah & Ors. vs South Indian Bank Limited & Anr. | Kerala High Court Directs DRT-I to List Securitisation Application Without Undue Delay; OP (DRT) Dismissed as Withdrawn with All Contentions Left Open

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 112
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners approached the High Court of Kerala by filing OP (DRT) No. 403 of 2022 in connection with proceedings before the Debts Recovery Tribunal-I, Ernakulam.The case record shows that the pet...

M/s Jai Mateshwari Steels Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner, Uttarakhand State GST & Others – Confiscation Under Section 130 CGST Act Based on Alleged Fake Supplier Despite Valid Invoice and E-Way Bill | Uttarakhand High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 98
Read More »
Facts of the CaseM/s Jai Mateshwari Steels Pvt. Ltd. filed Special Appeal Nos. 341 of 2022 and 342 of 2022 before the Uttarakhand High Court against the orders dated 15 September 2022 passed by the learned Single Judg...

M/s Pankaj Kumar Mishra vs State of Bihar & Ors. – Patna High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte GST Demand Under Section 74 of BGST Act for Violation of Natural Justice

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 130
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, M/s Pankaj Kumar Mishra, an individual firm, challenged proceedings arising from a tax demand under Section 74 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Assistant Commi...

M/s Jaysons Exports vs Union of India — Gujarat High Court: IGST Refund on Zero-Rated Exports Cannot Be Withheld for Selecting Higher Drawback Category; Sections 16(3)(b) IGST Act, 54 CGST Act & Rule 96 CGST Rules — 9% Interest Granted

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 107
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Jaysons Exports, was a partnership firm registered under GST and engaged in the export of goods including VT pumps, spindle, flange, rubber bush nitrile and impeller. During July ...

Sri Ashapura Jewellers vs. State of Kerala & Anr.: High Court of Kerala Dismisses Writ Petition Post-Issuance of Final Order Under Section 130 of the CGST/SGST Act While Reserving Taxpayer's Liberty to Pursue Statutory Appellate Remedies

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 96
Read More »
Facts of the Case·         The Interception & Initial Detention: The petitioner, Sri Ashapura Jewellers, a partnership firm operating from Kozhikode, Kerala, was subjected ...