Facts of the CasePalathra Telecom Infrastructure Private Limited, the
petitioner, was a Government contractor engaged in execution of public works.
The petitioner had executed the work of providing BM and BC to Theerad...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners had instituted writ petitions
before the Delhi High Court concerning the filing and/or revision of FORM
GST TRAN-1 electronically through the common GSTN Portal.During the hearing, lea...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Srinivas, shown as Accused No. 1, filed a
petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking
anticipatory bail in Crime No. 179 of 2022 of Sirguppa Police Station,
re...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, P. Balaji, was carrying on quarry
operations after obtaining the necessary licence/permit under the Tamil Nadu
Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959. The quarry permission was granted f...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Rajeev Kumar, approached the Patna High Court
seeking anticipatory bail as he apprehended arrest in connection with Sohsarai
P.S. Case No. 114 of 2022.The FIR was registered for alleged...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, N. Govindasamy, was carrying on
quarry operations after obtaining the necessary licence/permit under the Tamil
Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959. The permit was granted for a p...
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner, Srinivas V., approached the Karnataka High Court under Article
226 of the Constitution of India.
On 12
September 2018, the respondents issued a notice intimating th...
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner, M/s Sri Anjaneya Electrical and Civil Works, was a
proprietorship concern engaged in executing electrical and civil works,
including installation of electrical poles ...
Facts of the CaseSkyline Builders, represented by its Managing Partner Mr. K.V. Abdul Azeez, filed WP(C) No. 1156 of 2020 before the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam against the Union of India and various GST-related au...
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner, A.J. Annakutty, was the proprietress of Anjali Broilers,
described in the proceedings as defunct.
The
petitioner had arrears arising under the Kerala Value Added Ta...