Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,223,231
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Moitheensha vs Station House Officer, Chadayamangalam Police Station & Others: Kerala High Court Grants Police Protection for Loading and Unloading of Wooden Logs by Petitioner’s Own Workers Where No Operational Headload Workers Scheme Is in Force – Rule 26A of the Kerala Headload Workers Rules, 1981 and Kerala Headload Workers Act, 1978

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 97
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Moitheensha, was conducting a business establishment under the name Saj Traders. The writ petition was filed seeking police protection for the petitioner’s life and property, for th...

M/s Manipal Energy And Infratech Limited & Anr. Versus Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (AVVNL) & Anr. — Validity of Debarment/Blacklisting Orders Issued Without Specific Show-Cause Notice Specifying the Proposed Penalty and Violation of Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 46 of the Rajasthan Transparency in Public Procurement (RTPP) Act, 2012

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 122
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Tender and Joint Venture: A Joint Venture (JV) agreement was executed between M/s Manipal Energy And Infratech Limited (MEIL) and M/s K.S. Projects to participate in a turn-key t...

WPMS No. 3019 of 2022 – Petitioner vs State of Uttarakhand & Another: Uttarakhand High Court Quashes Order Rejecting Revocation of GST Registration Cancellation and Directs Reconsideration After Reasonable Opportunity of Hearing Within 30 Days – Section 30 of the CGST/UKGST Act, 2017

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 125
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe matter arose from an application seeking clarification of the High Court’s earlier order dated 7 December 2022. By that earlier order, the writ petition had been allowed at the stage of fresh a...

Tvl. V.N.S. Construction vs State Tax Officer (Review) – Madras High Court Sets Aside Section 74 TNGST Assessment on Alleged GSTR-7 vs GSTR-3B/GSTR-9 Turnover Mismatch; GST-Exempt Public Water Supply O&M Services Remanded Without Pre-Deposit Condition

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 120
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. V.N.S. Construction, represented by its Proprietor K. Vetrivel, challenged the assessment order dated 29.01.2026 passed by the respondent under Section 74 of the TNGST Act, 2017 ...

M/s V.V. Enterprises vs. Union of India and Others: High Court Quashes Retrospective Cancellation of GST Registration Under Section 29 of CGST Act Due to Failure to Supply Relied-Upon Evidence and Violation of Principles of Natural Justice

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 158
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, M/s V.V. Enterprises, was a registered entity under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) framework. The respondent authorities issued a Show Cause Notice (SCN) proposi...

M/S Super Drillers vs State of Tripura & Others – Undisputed Final Bill and Security Money Must Be Released to Proprietorship Firm Without Insisting on Succession Certificate | Article 226 of the Constitution of India | WP(C) No. 51 of 2022

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 86
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner approached the High Court of Tripura seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents, particularly respondent No. 3, to pay and release the undisputed final bill and security money...

Tarun Enterprises vs. State of Punjab and Others: Retrospective Cancellation of GST Registration Without Show Cause Notice Under Section 29 of CGST Act Violates Principles of Natural Justice and is Bad in Law — A Detailed Analysis of Punjab & Haryana High Court’s Landmark Judgment Relying on M/s Bansal Casting

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 90
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, M/s Tarun Enterprises, approached the Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana challenging an impugned order dated 23.09.2025 (Annexure P-2). Via this impu...

Yamuna M.K. vs National Highway Authority of India — Karnataka High Court Reserves Liberty to Seek Enhancement of Land Acquisition Compensation and Challenge GST Deduction on Structure Valuation | Article 227 of the Constitution of India

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 94
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Yamuna M.K., approached the High Court of Karnataka under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus against the respondents in relation to acquisition of her ...

M/s. Sunshine International Agri Tech vs Deputy Commissioner (ST) & Others — Madras High Court Sets Aside Section 73 TNGST Assessment Order for Non-Consideration of Filed Reply; Permits Jurisdictional Challenge and Fresh Adjudication by Intelligence Authority

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 90
Read More »
Facts of the CaseM/s. Sunshine International Agri Tech filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the impugned order dated 22.10.2024, described by the Court as an assessment ord...

Tvl. Hotel Shree Deiva vs Deputy State Tax Officer–2, Theni-1 Assessment Circle – Madras High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Section 73 TNGST Assessment Subject to 25% Disputed Tax Deposit and Orders Fresh Adjudication

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 99
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. Hotel Shree Deiva, represented by its Proprietor, R. Paulpandi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the assessment order dated 20.12....