Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,223,235
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Tvl. Cirangamalai Veeranan vs State Tax Officer – Madras High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte GST Assessment Order Under Section 73 of CGST/TNGST Act for GSTR-3B vs GSTR-7 Turnover Mismatch and Orders Fresh Assessment

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 130
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. Cirangamalai Veeranan, challenged the assessment order dated 12.09.2025 passed by the State Tax Officer for the assessment year 2023-24 under Section 73 of the GST law.The impugne...

Amit Kumar Mishra & Another vs State of Odisha: Orissa High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail in Alleged Cheating and Money Collection for Providing Services, Finding Strong Prima Facie Material and Nexus from Bank Transactions – Section 438 CrPC read with Sections 294, 323, 324, 420, 506 and 34 IPC

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 107
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, Amit Kumar Mishra and another, approached the Orissa High Court seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, apprehending arrest for their all...

Tvl. V.N.S Construction vs State Tax Officer (Review) — Section 74 TNGST Act: Madras High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte GST Demand Based on GSTR-7 vs GSTR-3B Turnover Difference; Exempt TWAD Board Services and GSTR-7 TDS Entries Require Fresh Consideration

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 98
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. V.N.S Construction, challenged an assessment order dated 29.01.2026 passed by the respondent under Section 74 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (TNGST Act) for th...

Tvl. V.N.S. Construction vs State Tax Officer (Review) – Madras High Court Sets Aside Section 74 TNGST Assessment Based on GSTR-7 vs GSTR-3B Turnover Difference Where Services Claimed Exempt Under Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate); Unconditional Remand Granted and Bank Attachment Lifted

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 142
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. V.N.S. Construction, represented by its proprietor K. Vetrivel, challenged the assessment order dated 29.01.2026 passed by the respondent, the State Tax Officer (Review), under S...

Hotel Indraprastha vs State Tax Officer & Others: Kerala High Court Suspends KGST Recovery Pending Disposal of Stay Petition in Statutory Appeal and Directs Appellate Authority to Decide Stay Application Within Two Months After Hearing – Assessment Year 2020-21

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 89
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Hotel Indraprastha, represented by its Managing Partner K.P. Indrabalan, was subjected to an assessment order under the provisions of the KGST Act for the Assessment Year 2020-2021. T...

Tvl. Amman Arul Spinners vs Deputy Commissioner (CT) (GST) (Appeals) & Another – Madras High Court: Ex-Parte GST Assessment and Time-Barred Appeal Set Aside Subject to 25% Disputed Tax Deposit; Matter Remanded for Fresh Adjudication under Section 107 of the GST Act

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 108
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. Amman Arul Spinners, was issued a Show Cause Notice dated 25.11.2024, pointing out certain discrepancies and proposing the imposition of tax, penalty and interest. According to t...

Naresh Women Hair Enterprises vs State of Telangana & Others: Telangana High Court Dismisses Challenge to 18% GST Condition on Highest Bid for Human Hair (Tala Neelalu) Tender as Infructuous After Tender Finalised in Favour of Third Parties; GST Exemption Grounds Left Open – Article 226, Articles 14 & 19(1)(g) of the Constitution

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 98
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, Naresh Women Hair Enterprises, represented by its proprietor Ch. Naresh, filed the writ petition challenging the action of Respondent No. 3, Sri Anjaneya Swamy Vari Devasthanam, K...

M/s Ramky Speciality Chemicals and Equipment vs Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax — Karnataka High Court Quashes Ex Parte Service Tax Order for Lack of Notice and Opportunity; Fresh Adjudication Directed Despite Nearly Three-Year Delay

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 91
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Ramky Speciality Chemicals and Equipment, challenged an Order-in-Original dated 28.12.2022/29.12.2022 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax under the Finance Act, 19...

M/s Span Pumps Private Limited Vs The Union of India & Others: Patna High Court Condoned GST Appeal Delay Due to COVID-19 Restrictions and Ordered De-Freezing of Bank Accounts Under Section 107 of the CGST Act

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 92
Read More »
Facts of the Case Assessment Order and Liability: The Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Patna Special Central, passed an ex parte assessment order dated 07.03.2020 and a subsequent demand order in ...

Tvl. V.N.S. Construction vs State Tax Officer (Review) – Madras High Court: Ex Parte GST Assessment for GSTR-7 vs GSTR-3B Turnover Difference Set Aside; Pure Services to TWAD Board Treated as GST-Exempt for Grant of Unconditional Reassessment Opportunity under Section 74A of TNGST Act

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 156
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. V.N.S. Construction, challenged the assessment order dated 29.01.2026 relating to the assessment year 2024-25. The writ petition sought quashing of the impugned assessment order ...