Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
R. Murugan vs Commissioner/Additional Chief Secretary, Commercial Tax Department & Another – Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Objections to GST Demand on Seigniorage Fee and Restrains Recovery Pending Disposal | Article 226 | CGST/TNGST Act, 2017
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, R. Murugan, was carrying on quarry
operations after obtaining the necessary licence/permit under the Tamil Nadu
Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1959. The licence/permit had been granted...
M/s AMK Athencottasan Muthamizh Kazhagam Man Power Services vs State Tax Officer (FAC) — Madras High Court Grants Conditional Remand of Section 73 TNGST Assessment on GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B IGST Mismatch and Disputed Waste Management Service Exemption; 25% Tax Deposit Directed
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s AMK Athencottasan Muthamizh Kazhagam
Man Power Services, represented by its Director, approached the Madurai
Bench of the Madras High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of
...
M/s Shri Kalyan Marbles vs Union of India & Others – Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Challenge to GST Levy on Mining Royalty, Following Consistent Precedents on Legislative Competence
Facts of the CaseM/s Shri Kalyan Marbles, through its proprietor Smt. Meena
Devi Sahu, filed a writ petition before the Rajasthan High Court challenging
the levy of Goods and Services Tax on royalty. The principal reli...
M/s Harihara Putra Bottle Supplies vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes & Others — Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Section 73(9) KGST Adjudication Orders on GSTR-3B vs GSTR-2A Discrepancy and Ineligible ITC; Fresh Adjudication Ordered Subject to ₹10,000 Cost for Each Year
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Harihara Putra Bottle Supplies,
approached the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the
Constitution of India, challenging adjudication orders passed by the
Commer...
Tvl. P. Rengasamy vs Deputy State Tax Officer-2 — Madras High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Section 74 TNGST Assessment on GSTR-1, GSTR-3B and GSTR-7 Mismatch; 23% Recovery Treated as Sufficient Condition for Remand
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. P. Rengasamy, a works contractor,
approached the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India challenging an assessment order dated 18 July...
Petitioner(s) in WPMB No. 9 of 2026 & Connected Matters vs State of Uttarakhand – Sections 63, 73, 74 and 169 Uttarakhand GST Act – Mere Uploading of GST Notices on Portal After Cancellation of Registration Insufficient; Proceedings Permitted from Show Cause Notice Stage: Uttarakhand High Court
Facts of the CaseA batch of writ petitions involving common questions of fact
and law came before the Division Bench of the Uttarakhand High Court. The
petitions were clubbed together and decided by a common judgment.F...
Sunder Lal Gupta vs M/s Sahyog Hospitality & Ors. – Section 17(2) Arbitration Act Interim Order Cannot Be Independently Enforced After Merger into Final Award; Sections 34(3) and 36(1) Govern Enforcement: Delhi High Court
Facts of the CaseThe Decree Holder, Sh. Sunder Lal Gupta, instituted the
petition under Section 17(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,
read with Order XXI Rule 11(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908,
...
Tvl. Sugam Pharmacy vs State Tax Officer & Anr. – Sections 73 and 161 TNGST Act – Ex Parte GST Assessment, Rectification and Appellate Orders Set Aside Subject to 25% Deposit: Madras High Court
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. Sugam Pharmacy, represented by its
proprietor M. Sheik Abdulla, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India challenging the order dated 05 February 2026 be...
Deepak Kumar Saraf @ Deepak Sarraf vs State of Bihar & Anr. – Sections 406 and 420 IPC – Criminal Prosecution Cannot Continue in Pure Business Transaction Without Initial Dishonest Intention: Patna High Court
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner approached the Patna High Court seeking
quashing of the order of cognizance dated 11 November 2022 passed by the
learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Katihar in Complaint Case No. 591...
M/s Mohd Maqbool Lone vs Union Territory of J&K & Ors. – J&K and Ladakh High Court Declines Article 226 Writ Against ₹36 Crore GST Demand Under Section 74; Holds Section 107 Appeal Is Efficacious Alternative Remedy Where No Natural Justice Exception Is Established
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Mohd Maqbool Lone, was
an assessee registered under the Goods and Services Tax law. It challenged an
order dated 31 December 2025, whereby a demand of ₹36,00,58,562.16
towards GS...