Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,218,458
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

EVM Premium Cars India Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India & Others – Kerala High Court: TCS Under Income-tax Act Not Includible in GST Taxable Value on Sale of Motor Vehicles | Section 15(2) of CGST Act

Author
My Tax Expert
21/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 65
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, EVM Premium Cars India Pvt. Ltd., approached the Kerala High Court by filing WP(C) No. 6711 of 2019.The writ petition raised a specific question concerning the determination of taxable ...

Niraj Singh @ Neeraj Kumar Singh vs State of Bihar – Patna High Court Highlights Systemic Failure in Implementation of Bihar Prohibition Law; Refers Matter for Public Interest Litigation | Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 & Article 47 of the Constitution

Author
My Tax Expert
21/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 102
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner sought confirmation of the provisional bail granted in connection with an offence registered under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.During the hearing, the Court examined vario...

Rajasree Motors Pvt. Ltd. & Others vs Union of India & Others – Kerala High Court: TCS Collected Under Income-tax Act Not Includible in GST Taxable Value on Sale of Motor Vehicles | Section 15(2) of CGST Act

Author
My Tax Expert
21/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 59
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioners, namely Rajasree Motors Pvt. Ltd., Manikandan Automobile Pvt. Ltd. and Manikandan Motor Pvt. Ltd., approached the Kerala High Court by filing WP(C) No. 4868 of 2019.The writ petition ra...

Mind Mart vs State of Odisha & Another – Orissa High Court Sets Aside Blacklisting Order for Violation of Natural Justice; Premature Police Complaint Could Not Justify Adverse Inference | Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India

Author
My Tax Expert
21/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 47
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Mind Mart, approached the Orissa High Court challenging an order by which the Petitioner firm had been blacklisted from providing manpower in Jajpur District.The background of the dispu...

M/s Sri Sai Krishna Constructions & Connected Matters vs State of Jharkhand & Others – Jharkhand High Court Directs Time-Bound Decision on GST Differential Tax Reimbursement Claims in Pre-GST Works Contracts | GST on Ongoing Works Contracts | SOP Dated 26.08.2022

Author
My Tax Expert
21/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 54
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseA large number of contractors executing Government works contracts in the State of Jharkhand approached the High Court through several writ petitions raising a common grievance relating to the ...

Popular Motor World Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India & Others: TCS Under Income-tax Act Not Includible in Taxable Value for GST Under Section 15(2) of CGST Act | Kerala High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
21/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 48
Read More »
Facts of the CasePopular Motor World Pvt. Ltd., engaged in the business of sale of motor vehicles, approached the Kerala High Court raising the question whether amounts collected as Tax Collected at Source (TCS) under ...

M/s Sri Sai Krishna Constructions vs State of Jharkhand — Differential GST Reimbursement on Pre-GST Works Contracts to Be Decided Under SOP dated 26.08.2022, Preferably Within 8 Weeks

Author
My Tax Expert
21/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 68
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA batch of writ petitions was filed before the Jharkhand High Court by contractors and infrastructure entities whose works contracts had been awarded during the pre-GST regime and remained subsisting o...

M/s SPK and Co vs State Tax Officer / Commercial Tax Officer — Madras High Court Keeps Section 74 TNGST Assessment and Bank Attachment Action in Abeyance on 18% GST over ₹23.70 Lakh Seigniorage Fee Pending Supreme Court Decision in Udaipur Chambers of Commerce and Industry vs Union of India

Author
My Tax Expert
21/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 78
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s SPK and Co, represented by its Joint Managing Partner, approached the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.The writ petition sought ...

M/s Anasurya Traders vs State of Andhra Pradesh — Transmission Belting Qualifies for Tax Exemption Under Section 8 of the APGST Act Despite Entry 101 / Item 12 of the Sixth Schedule

Author
My Tax Expert
21/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 55
Read More »
Facts of the CaseM/s Anasurya Traders was a registered dealer on the rolls of the Commercial Tax Officer, Main Bazar, Guntur, carrying on business in V-belts, transmission belts and related goods. The dispute concern...

M/s Anasurya Traders vs State of Andhra Pradesh – Transmission Belting Classified as Cotton Fabric Exempt from Sales Tax under Section 8 of the APGST Act Despite Entry 101 / Item 12 Tax Rate

Author
My Tax Expert
21/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 55
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Anasurya Traders, Guntur, was a registered dealer on the rolls of the Commercial Tax Officer, Main Bazar, Guntur, and was engaged in the business of V-Belts, Transmission Belts and ...