Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-19 vs Shri Neeraj Jindal & Anr. | Delhi High Court | Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on Income Declared in Return filed u/s 153A – Whether Mere Disclosure After Search Amounts to Concealment?
Facts of the CaseThe assessees had originally filed their returns
under Section 139(1) declaring lower income for AY 2005-06 and AY 2006-07.A search operation under Section 132 was conducted
in the JM Estate Developers...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-3) vs Suncity Projects Pvt. Ltd. | Delay Condonation Rejected for Failure to Explain 86 Days Delay | Delhi High Court | Section 260A of the Income Tax Act
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue filed multiple appeals against the
order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 21.03.2016. However, there was
a delay of 86 days in filing the appeals before the Delhi High Court.Appl...
Commissioner of Income Tax-IV vs M/s Daurala Foods & Beverages Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court | Delay in Re-filing Appeal by Revenue | Condonation of Delay Rejected
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue/Appellant preferred two income tax
appeals before the Delhi High Court against M/s Daurala Foods & Beverages
Pvt. Ltd. However, after the initial filing, the appeals were re-filed afte...
Commissioner of Income Tax-IV vs M/s Daurala Foods & Beverages Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court | Condonation of Delay in Re-filing Income Tax Appeal | Sufficient Cause under Limitation Law
Facts of the
CaseThe Revenue instituted two appeals before the High
Court under the Income Tax Act. At the stage of re-filing, it was observed that
both appeals were substantially delayed by 890 days. Applications
se...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-3 vs Suncity Projects Pvt. Ltd. | Delay Condonation Rejected for Failure to Explain Each Day’s Delay | Section 260A of the Income Tax Act
Facts of the
Case
The Income Tax Department preferred multiple appeals before the
Delhi High Court against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal.
There was a delay of 86 days in filing t...
Rajesh Projects (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS)-II & Ors. Delhi High Court Clarifies TDS Liability on Lease Premium, Annual Lease Rent and Interest Payable to GNOIDA under Sections 194-I, 194A, 201 & 221 of the Income-tax Act, 1961
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners, being real estate developers,
builders, and financial institutions, had entered into long-term lease
agreements (90 years) with the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority
(GN...
Rajesh Projects (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) & Ors. | Delhi High Court on TDS Applicability on Lease Premium, Lease Rent and Interest Paid to GNOIDA under Sections 194-I, 194A, 201 & 221 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioners, being real estate developers and
banking institutions, entered into long-term lease agreements of 90 years with
Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNOIDA) for devel...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-3 vs Suncity Projects Pvt. Ltd. | Delay Condonation Rejected for Failure to Explain 86 Days Delay | Section 260A Income Tax Act
Facts of the
CaseThe Income Tax Department preferred multiple
appeals before the Delhi High Court against the order of the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal dated 21.03.2016. The appeals were filed with a delay of 86
day...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-3 vs Suncity Projects Pvt. Ltd. | Delay Condonation Rejected for Failure to Explain 86 Days’ Delay | Delhi High Court | Section 260A Income Tax Act
Facts of the CaseThe Income Tax Department preferred multiple
appeals before the Delhi High Court against the order passed by the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal dated 21.03.2016. However, the appeals were filed with a
...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-3 vs Suncity Projects Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court | Condonation of Delay Rejected for Failure to Explain 86 Days’ Delay under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act
Facts of the
Case
The Revenue preferred multiple appeals against the order of the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
There was a delay of 86 days in filing the appeals before
the High Court.
Applications...