Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,240,129
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Income Tax-IV vs M/s Dixon Technologies (India) Pvt. Ltd. - Eligibility of Deduction under Section 80-IC for Manufacturing Activity and Units Located in Notified Areas of Uttarakhand | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
20/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 167
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee was engaged in manufacturing and assembling air-conditioners and microwave ovens by using different components and parts sourced from third parties. The assessee claimed deduction under ...

Commissioner of Income Tax-6 vs Mona Advertising & Marketing Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Revenue Appeals Dismissed Due to Procedural Defect | Section 153A & Section 68 Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
20/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 199
Read More »
Facts of the Case The ITAT passed a common order dated 29 October 2014 in relation to multiple assessment years. The Revenue challenged the said order before the Delhi High Court. The assessee h...

CIT-I vs ACL Wireless Ltd. - Delhi High Court Holds Software Product Improvement and Upgradation Expenses as Revenue Expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
20/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 170
Read More »
Facts of the Case ACL Wireless Ltd. was engaged in software development relating to wireless solutions and instant messaging applications for mobile users. The company had already capitalized the original soft...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs. Sudhir Budhraja – Delhi High Court Upholds Genuine Foreign Gift, Deletes Addition under Sections 68 & 69 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
20/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 187
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a Chartered Accountant, filed his income tax return for Assessment Year 1995–96 declaring professional income. During scrutiny, it was noticed that apart from consultancy receipts from ...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs Globus Securities & Finance Pvt. Ltd. – Section 68 Income Tax Act | Share Capital, Share Premium, Accommodation Entries & Burden of Proof in Private Companies

Author
My Tax Expert
20/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 182
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Globus Securities & Finance Pvt. Ltd., received a total amount of ₹51,10,000 from six different corporate entities towards share capital and share premium during Asses...

Li & Fung India Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax – Delhi High Court | Transfer Pricing under TNMM: Whether TPO Can Apply Mark-up on FOB Value of Exports for Determination of Arm’s Length Price

Author
My Tax Expert
20/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 246
Read More »
Facts of the CaseLi & Fung India Pvt. Ltd. (LFIL) was a wholly owned subsidiary of Li & Fung (South Asia) Ltd., Mauritius and acted as a captive offshore sourcing service provider. Its Associated Enterprise in...

Lease Plan India Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax | Delhi High Court on Invalid Reassessment under Sections 147 & 148 of Income Tax Act for Absence of Proper “Reason to Believe”

Author
My Tax Expert
20/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 221
Read More »
Facts of the Case Lease Plan India Limited filed its return for AY 2005–06 and the matter was subjected to scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. The return originally reflecte...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi vs. Sudhir Budhraja – Delhi High Court Upholds Genuine Foreign Gift, Deletes Addition under Sections 68 & 69 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
20/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 120
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a Chartered Accountant, filed his income tax return for Assessment Year 1995–96 declaring professional income. During scrutiny, it was noticed that apart from consultancy receipts from ...

Commissioner of Income Tax-XV vs Bharti Mishra – Delhi High Court Holds Section 54F Exemption Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Construction of Residential House Started Before Sale of Original Asset | ITA No. 567/2013

Author
My Tax Expert
20/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 289
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee, an individual taxpayer, sold shares and earned sale proceeds amounting to ₹54,86,965. The assessee claimed exemption under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act by investing the...

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-5 vs JKD Capital & Finlease Ltd Delhi High Court Clarifies Limitation for Penalty Proceedings under Section 271E: Penalty for Violation of Section 269T Cannot Be Imposed Beyond the Statutory Time Limit under Section 275(1)(c)

Author
My Tax Expert
20/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 172
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for Assessment Year 2005–06. The ITAT had upheld ...