Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi Central-III vs Vishan Das & Others – Delhi High Court on Levy of Interest under Sections 245D(2C), 245D(6A), and Settlement Commission Proceedings under Income Tax Act
Facts of the
Case
A search operation was conducted on the premises of K.C. Group on
05.10.2001.
During the search proceedings, cash amounting to ₹2,16,500 and
stock valued at ₹53,21,218 along with bo...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi Central-III vs Govind Lal & Ved Prakash – Delhi High Court on Income Tax Appeals and Reference to Detailed Findings in ITA No. 404/2013
Facts of the
Case
The Revenue, through the Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi
Central-III, filed appeals before the Delhi High Court.
The appeals concerned Govind Lal and Ved Prakash respectively.
During hear...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi Central-III vs Govind Lal & Ved Prakash – Delhi High Court on Section 132(3) Search Proceedings and Income Tax Assessment Issues
Facts of the
Case
The Revenue, namely Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi Central-III,
filed appeals against the respondents Govind Lal and Ved Prakash.
The controversy originated from assessment proceedings con...
Commissioner of Income Tax-14 vs Anil Arora | Delhi High Court | Addition under Sections 69B, 69A, 23(4)(b), 142A & Search Assessment under Section 153A – DVO Valuation Cannot Replace Actual Purchase Consideration
Facts of the
CaseA search and seizure operation under Section 132 of
the Income Tax Act was conducted in the case of Wings Pharmaceuticals Pvt.
Ltd., in which the assessee, Mr. Anil Arora, was also covered. Consequent...
Director of Income Tax, Delhi vs M/s Lufthansa Cargo India | Delhi High Court on Aircraft Overhaul Payments as Fees for Technical Services under Sections 9(1)(vii), 195 & 201 of the Income Tax Act
Facts of the
Case
The assessee was engaged in the business of wet-leasing aircraft
and had acquired Boeing aircraft from foreign entities.
The aircrafts were wet-leased primarily to Lufthansa Cargo AG,
G...
Commissioner of Income Tax (C)-I vs. Shri Suresh Nanda – Delhi High Court | Exclusion of Forced Stay Period for Determining Non-Resident Status under Section 6(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of the
Case
Shri Suresh Nanda claimed Non-Resident Indian (NRI) status.
During relevant periods, his passport had been seized/impounded by
investigating authorities.
The impounding of the passport was ...
Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-I vs Shri Suresh Nanda | Delhi High Court | Exclusion of Involuntary Stay in India for Determining Residential Status under Section 6(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act
Facts of the
CaseShri Suresh Nanda had claimed the status of a
non-resident for the relevant assessment years. During the assessment
proceedings, the Assessing Officer determined that the assessee had stayed in
India...
Commissioner of Income Tax (C)-I vs Shri Suresh Nanda – Delhi High Court | Involuntary Stay in India Due to Passport Impounding Cannot Determine Residential Status under Section 6(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of the
Case
Shri Suresh Nanda had consistently been assessed as a Non-Resident
Indian (NRI) since 1985 and had business interests outside India,
primarily in UAE.
The assessee visited India on 28.0...
Commissioner of Income Tax-IV vs M/s Grup Ism Pvt. Ltd. | Delhi High Court on TDS Liability on Foreign Remittances, Fees for Technical Services (FTS), Section 9(1)(vii), Section 40(a)(i) & India-UAE DTAA
Facts of the
CaseDuring Assessment Year 2004–05, the Assessing
Officer noticed that the assessee had made payments aggregating to ₹94,31,826
to two UAE-based concerns:
M/s CGS International, UAE – ₹56,54,963...
Anshika Investment Pvt. Ltd. & Apoorva Extrusion Pvt. Ltd. vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-3 – Delhi High Court on Withdrawal of Appeal and Right to Challenge Additions under Section 153 of the Income Tax Act
Facts of the
Case
The appellants, namely Anshika Investment Pvt. Ltd. and Apoorva
Extrusion Pvt. Ltd., had filed appeals before the Delhi High Court.
The dispute arose in relation to additions made during proc...