Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,224,252
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu & Kashmir vs M/s Sumil Chemicals Industries Pvt. Ltd. – Excise Appeal Dismissed as Covered by Earlier Judgment | CEA No. 409/2022

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 66
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise, Jammu & Kashmir, filed an appeal before the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh challenging the order passed in favour of M/s Sumil Chem...

M/s Gordhandas Gobindram A Company vs State of Chhattisgarh & Others – Reimbursement of Additional GST Liability on Pre-GST Works Contracts | Chhattisgarh High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 86
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Gordhandas Gobindram A Company, had been awarded a public works contract prior to the implementation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime on 1 July 2017. After GST came into ...

Bundelkhand University, Kanpur Road, Jhansi vs Union of India & Others – Affiliation Fee to Colleges Whether Exempt from GST as Educational Service | Challenge to Show Cause Notice | Writ Petition Dismissed

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 58
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Bundelkhand University, Kanpur Road, Jhansi, filed a writ petition challenging the show cause notices dated 30.07.2022 and 17.08.2022 issued by the GST authorities. The University cont...

Ranjita Pegu vs State of Assam – Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely for Non-Recovery of Money | Section 438 CrPC | Sections 406, 420 & 506 IPC

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 87
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe applicant, Ranjita Pegu, proprietor of M/s Ram Electronics & Equipment, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in connection with Tezpur P.S. Case ...

M/s Gordhandas Gobindram A vs State of Chhattisgarh – Reimbursement of Additional GST Liability on Pre-GST Works Contracts | Chhattisgarh High Court | GST on Government Contracts

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 96
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Gordhandas Gobindram A, had been awarded a government works contract before the introduction of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime on 01.07.2017. After GST came into force, the...

M/s Ratna Khanij Udyog vs State of Chhattisgarh & Others – Reimbursement of Additional GST Burden on Pre-GST Works Contracts | Chhattisgarh High Court | WPT No.160 of 2018 | Order dated 15.12.2022

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 63
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Ratna Khanij Udyog, was awarded contracts by the respondents for construction and widening of roads under the pre-GST tax regime. At the time of bidding and execution of the contra...

S.Shanmuganathan vs The District Collector & Others – Rejection of Tender Bid for Non-Compliance with Tender Conditions | Madras High Court | Article 226 of the Constitution of India

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 64
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondents issued a tender notification dated 18.09.2022 inviting applications from eligible persons for taking shops in the Regulated Market Committee commercial complex at Ramanathapuram on rent...

M/s Paras Industrial Sales vs State of Uttar Pradesh & Another – Assessment Order Set Aside for Failure to Grant Mandatory Personal Hearing under Sections 74 & 75(4) of the CGST/UPGST Act, 2017

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 90
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged the assessment order dated 13.09.2022, passed under Section 74 of the CGST/UPGST Act, 2017, on the ground that the statutory requirement of granting a personal hearing had no...

M/s. Sai Sudha Technologies vs Commissioner of GST & Central Tax & Others – Telangana High Court | Appeal Cannot Be Rejected Permanently for Delay in Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 Read with Section 85 of the Finance Act, 1994

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 73
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s. Sai Sudha Technologies, is a registered taxable person. The Department issued a show cause notice alleging non-payment of service tax amounting to ₹6,38,700 for the period 2016-1...

M/s Venkateswara Traders vs Joint Commissioner (Appeals) & Others – Delay of 119 Days in GST Appeal Condoned; Cancellation of GST Registration Remanded for Fresh Decision | W.P. No. 35300 of 2022 | Andhra Pradesh High Court | Section 107 of the CGST/APGST Act

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 69
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged the order passed by the Joint Commissioner (Appeals), whereby the appeal filed against the cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration was dismissed solely on the groun...