Facts of the
CaseHirise Builders and Developers had suffered orders
imposing penalty for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11 under the Kerala
Value Added Tax Act. The petitioner’s case was that there had been n...
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise, Jammu
filed Central Excise Appeal No. 224/2022, along with CM Nos. 4647/2022 and
4648/2022, against M/s Casil Industries Ltd. before the High Court...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, M/s. Bhanjadeo Constructions,
filed the writ petition challenging the action of the State of Odisha and other
opposite parties in not reimbursing the differential tax amount arising fr...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner approached the High Court by way of
a writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus against the respondents for not
withdrawing the impugned orders in Form ASMT-13 dated 17.11.2021 relating ...
Facts of the
CaseThe accused-petitioner, Raju Sakthivel,
filed an application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
seeking regular bail in connection with CBI ACB Guwahati RC 7(A)
2022/CBI-GWH.The case...
Facts of the CaseD.B.S. Constructions Pvt. Ltd., a registered contractor,
claimed to have carried out maintenance work under the “Operation and Minor
Maintenance Work of Shirkhinda SHP (2 × 350 KW)” pursuant to an...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner was a company engaged in the
business of software development, data processing and digitalization.In 2016, respondent No. 2 requested the petitioner
company to develop 11 Android softwa...
Facts of the
CaseGreen Fizz Beverages Private Limited, the writ
petitioner and appellant, filed an intra-court appeal against the order dated 18.07.2022
passed in W.P.A. No. 15484 of 2022.The original writ petition ch...
Facts of the
CaseM/s S.S. Diagnostics and Surgical, a proprietorship
firm, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 31.03.2022 passed by
the Assistant Commissioner of State Taxes, Patna North Circle, Patna, u...
Facts of the CasePrathiba Shikshana Samithi (Regd.), respondent No. 2, had been
allotted a civic amenity site. The lease granted in its favour was due to
expire on 25 February 2014. Thereafter, respondent No. 2 submitt...