Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,221,726
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now

Star Cement Ltd. & Ors. vs Union of India & Ors. – Gauhati High Court on Section 174(2)(c) of CGST Act, 2017, GST Budgetary Support Scheme, NEIIPP 2007 and Promissory Estoppel

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 107
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe batch of writ petitions was filed by industrial units operating in the North Eastern Region, including Star Cement Ltd. and other eligible manufacturing units. The petitioners had established new...

Star Cement Ltd. vs Union of India & Ors. – Gauhati High Court on NEIIPP 2007, GST Budgetary Support, Promissory Estoppel and Section 174(2)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 113
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe batch of writ petitions was filed by industrial units including Star Cement Ltd. and other eligible manufacturing units operating in the North-Eastern Region, which claimed fiscal incentives unde...

Star Cement Ltd. vs Union of India & Ors. – Gauhati High Court on Section 174(2)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017: Promissory Estoppel Cannot Preserve 100% Excise Exemption After GST; Budgetary Support Scheme Upheld in Light of Hero MotoCorp Case

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 108
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe lead petitioner, Star Cement Ltd., along with several similarly situated industrial units in the North Eastern Region, approached the Gauhati High Court challenging the curtailment of fiscal ince...

Star Cement Ltd. vs Union of India & Ors. – Gauhati High Court Upholds GST Budgetary Support Scheme; Rejects Claim for Full Tax Exemption under NEIIPP, 2007 in View of Section 174(2)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017 and Hero Motocorp Case

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 100
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA batch of writ petitions was filed by industrial units operating in the North Eastern Region, including Star Cement Ltd. and other eligible manufacturing entities that had established or expanded th...

Star Cement Ltd. vs Union of India & Ors. – Section 174(2)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017 – Gauhati High Court Rejects Claim for Continuation of 100% Tax Exemption/Refund under NEIIPP, 2007 after GST; Hero Motocorp Ltd. Case Applied

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 107
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe lead petitioner, Star Cement Ltd., along with several industrial units in connected writ petitions, had established and operated manufacturing units in the North-Eastern Region and had availed or...

Star Cement Ltd. vs Union of India & Ors. — Gauhati High Court on Section 174(2)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017, GST Budgetary Support, Promissory Estoppel and Legitimate Expectation under NEIIPP, 2007

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 110
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe batch of writ petitions was filed by industrial units operating in the North Eastern Region and availing fiscal incentives under the North East Industrial and Investment Promotion Policy, 2007 (N...

Star Cement Ltd. & Ors. vs Union of India & Ors. – Gauhati High Court Upholds Limited GST Budgetary Support; Section 174(2)(c) CGST Act Bars Continuation of Rescinded Excise Exemption Despite Promissory Estoppel Claim

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 100
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA batch of writ petitions, led by Star Cement Ltd. vs Union of India & Ors., was filed before the Gauhati High Court by industrial units operating in the North Eastern Region. The petitioners had...

Star Cement Ltd. vs Union of India — Section 174(2)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017: Gauhati High Court Rejects Challenge to GST Budgetary Support Scheme and Claim for Full Continuation of NEIIPP, 2007 Tax Benefits

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 113
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA batch of writ petitions, led by Star Cement Ltd. vs Union of India, was filed by industrial units operating in the North Eastern Region. The petitioners included manufacturing entities that claimed...

Avishek Dey vs State of Assam – Gauhati High Court Refuses Anticipatory Bail Under Section 438 CrPC in IPC Sections 120B, 381, 408 and 409 Misappropriation Case

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 133
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Avishek Dey, apprehending arrest in connection with Bhangagarh P.S. Case No. 241/2022 registered under Sections 120B, 381, 409 and 408 of the Indian Penal Code, approached the Gauhati...

Star Cement Ltd. vs Union of India & Ors. – Gauhati High Court on Section 174(2)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017, NEIIPP 2007, GST Budgetary Support, Promissory Estoppel and Legitimate Expectation

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 93
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe proceedings arose from a batch of writ petitions filed by industrial units operating in the North-Eastern Region, with Star Cement Ltd. vs Union of India & Ors. being the lead matter. The pet...