Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Meenatchisundaram vs Commissioner, Commercial Tax Department – GST on Seigniorage Fee for Quarry Operations: Recovery Restrained Pending Objections in Light of Lakhwinder Singh Case
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Meenatchisundaram, was carrying on quarry
operations after obtaining the necessary licence/permit under the Tamil Nadu
Minor and Mineral Concession Rules, 1959.The licence/permit had be...
Meenatchisundaram vs Commissioner, Commercial Tax Department – GST on Seigniorage Fee for Quarry Operations: Recovery Restrained Pending Objections in Light of Lakhwinder Singh Case
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Meenatchisundaram, was carrying on quarry
operations after obtaining the necessary licence/permit under the Tamil Nadu
Minor and Mineral Concession Rules, 1959.The licence/permit had be...
Alavumkudy Moosan Alshas vs State Tax Officer – Kerala High Court Stays GST Recovery on Payment of 20% Disputed Tax Under Section 112(8)(b) Due to Non-Constitution of GST Appellate Tribunal
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Alavumkudy Moosan Alshas, was subjected to an
assessment order referred to in the judgment as Ext.P1.The assessment order related to the year 2017-18 and had been
issued by the State Ta...
Smt. Shailaja Chandrashekar vs Additional Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals) – Appeal Against GST Registration Cancellation Maintainable Under Section 107 Despite Revocation Remedy Under Section 30 of CGST Act
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Smt. Shailaja Chandrashekar, approached the
Karnataka High Court challenging the Order-in-Appeal dated 22 April 2022 passed
by the Additional Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals).The p...
Manoj Yadav vs State of Chhattisgarh – Regular Bail Granted Under Section 439 CrPC in Alleged GST and Income-tax Fraud Case Involving Sections 420, 467, 468 IPC and Section 66-D IT Act
Facts of the CaseThe applicant, Manoj Yadav, filed his second bail application
under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking regular bail
in connection with Crime No. 55/2021 registered at Police St...
The Official Liquidator of M/s Testeels Ltd. (In Liquidation) vs NA – Gujarat High Court Permits Minimum Wages Plus Applicable CGST and SGST for Security Agency Under Section 457 of Companies Act, 1956 and Rule 9 of Companies (Court) Rules, 1959
Facts of the CaseThe Official Liquidator of M/s Testeels Ltd. (In Liquidation)
filed a further report before the Gujarat High Court seeking modified relief
concerning the monthly security bills of M/s Shubham Protectio...
EVM Autokraft India Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India – TCS Under Income-tax Act Not Includible in Taxable Value of Supply for GST Under Section 15(2) of CGST Act
Facts of the CaseEVM Autokraft India Pvt. Ltd., engaged in the sale of motor
vehicles, approached the High Court of Kerala by filing a writ petition raising
the issue of whether amounts collected as Tax Collected at So...
EVM Premium Cars India Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India & Others – Kerala High Court: TCS Under Income-tax Act Not Includible in GST Taxable Value on Sale of Motor Vehicles | Section 15(2) of CGST Act
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, EVM Premium Cars India Pvt. Ltd.,
approached the Kerala High Court by filing WP(C) No. 6711 of 2019.The writ petition raised a specific question concerning the
determination of taxable ...
Rajasree Motors Pvt. Ltd. & Others vs Union of India & Others – Kerala High Court: TCS Collected Under Income-tax Act Not Includible in GST Taxable Value on Sale of Motor Vehicles | Section 15(2) of CGST Act
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioners, namely Rajasree Motors Pvt. Ltd.,
Manikandan Automobile Pvt. Ltd. and Manikandan Motor Pvt. Ltd., approached
the Kerala High Court by filing WP(C) No. 4868 of 2019.The writ petition ra...
Mind Mart vs State of Odisha & Another – Orissa High Court Sets Aside Blacklisting Order for Violation of Natural Justice; Premature Police Complaint Could Not Justify Adverse Inference | Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Mind Mart, approached the Orissa High
Court challenging an order by which the Petitioner firm had been blacklisted
from providing manpower in Jajpur District.The background of the dispu...