Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Rajiv Dutta vs State of Punjab | Anticipatory Bail Granted on Parity in GST Tax Evasion Scam | Sections 438 CrPC, 7, 7A & 8 Prevention of Corruption Act, Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 201 & 120-B IPC | Punjab & Haryana High Court
Facts of the CaseThe petitions were filed seeking anticipatory bail
under Section 438 CrPC in connection with FIR No. 8 dated 21.08.2020 registered
by the Vigilance Bureau, Punjab, relating to an alleged GST tax ...
R. Ramesh vs Deputy State Tax Officer-1 – Madras High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Section 73 TNGST DRC-07 Order on Section 17(5) Blocked ITC Dispute for Iron and Steel Used by Civil Works Contractor; Fresh Adjudication Subject to 25% Disputed Tax Deposit
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, R. Ramesh, represented by
its proprietor Ramasamy Ramesh, approached the Madurai Bench of the Madras High
Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.The petitioner challenged...
Tvl. VARS Enterprises vs Assistant Commissioner (State Tax) – Madras High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Section 73 TNGST Assessment on GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B Reconciliation, GSTR-3B vs GSTR-2A ITC Mismatch and Section 16(4) Time-Bar; 25% Deposit Excludes Section 16(5) ITC Issue
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. VARS Enterprises,
represented by its partner A. Ramanathan, approached the Madurai Bench of the
Madras High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.The petitioner cha...
Tvl. D. Lingam Medicals vs Deputy State Tax Officer-2 – Madras High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Section 73 TNGST Assessment for Alleged Suppressed Sales; Section 22 Registration Threshold and Jurisdiction Plea to Be Reconsidered Without 25% Pre-Deposit
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. D. Lingam Medicals,
represented by its proprietor D. Devaraj, filed a writ petition under Article
226 of the Constitution of India challenging the assessment order dated 22.12.202...
M/s Zeus India vs State of Karnataka – Karnataka High Court Quashes Section 73(1) GST DRC-07 Order in Part for Reconsideration of ITC Claimed Through Returns Filed Before 30.11.2021 | Section 16(5) KGST Act
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, M/s Zeus India, represented
by its proprietor Shri Syed Gulsheer, approached the Karnataka High Court under
Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the
adjudicat...
M/s AMK Athencottasan Muthamizh Kazhagam Man Power Services vs State Tax Officer – Madras High Court Sets Aside Section 62 TNGST Best Judgment Assessment After Filing of Returns; Returns Must Be Considered in Reassessment | MANS Nadar and Co. Case Followed
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, M/s AMK Athencottasan Muthamizh
Kazhagam Man Power Services, represented by its Director R. Arul Kannan,
filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
challengi...
Sanarpatti Panchayath vs Commercial Tax Officer – Madras High Court Sets Aside GST Registration Cancellation Order and Directs Revival Subject to Compliance with Tvl. Suguna Cutpiece Center Conditions | Article 226, CGST/TNGST Act
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Sanarpatti Panchayath,
represented by its Special Officer/BDO P. Kamaraj, approached the Madurai Bench
of the Madras High Court challenging the cancellation of its GST registration.The...
Tvl. Punitha Antony Store vs State Tax Officer (Roving Squad-2) – Madras High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte GST Assessment on 25% Disputed Tax Deposit; GSTR-3B vs GSTR-2A ITC Mismatch Due to Suppliers Reporting B2C Instead of B2B | Sections 73
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. Punitha Antony Store,
represented by its proprietor Rajaprakash, challenged an assessment order dated
19.01.2026 relating to Assessment Year 2025-26. The assessment
was passed ex...
M/s Metal Syndicate & Anr. vs Union of India & Ors. – Gauhati High Court Quashes ₹78.70 Lakh GST ITC Demand; Bona Fide Purchaser Cannot Be Denied ITC for Supplier’s Failure to Deposit Tax Under Sections 16(2)(c), 16(2)(d), 50, 74(1) & 122 of CGST Act, 2017
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner No. 1, M/s Metal Syndicate,
is a proprietorship firm having its registered office at Kathal Road, Silchar,
Assam, and petitioner No. 2 is its proprietor, Sri Dipak Kangsa Banik.The peti...
Tvl. Manickavasagam S. vs The Proper Officer/Commercial Tax Officer – Madras High Court Sets Aside Section 74 TNGST Assessment on GST Levy on Seigniorage Fees; Reply Not Considered and Final Demand Kept in Abeyance Pending Supreme Court Judgment
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. Manickavasagam S.,
filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
challenging the impugned assessment order dated 24.02.2026 passed by the
respondent, The P...