Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/s Yash Enterprises, a proprietorship represented by its proprietor Yash Agrawal of Kishanganj, Bihar, challenged before the Patna High Court the dismissal of its appeal filed under Se...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/s. A.S.E. India, a partnership firm holding GSTIN 36AAGFA9373E1ZD, challenged a notice dated 02.12.2022 issued by the third respondent (Assistant Commissioner of State Tax) blocking i...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, Arpan Agro Industries, Ludhiana, Punjab, represented by its proprietor Arpan Goyal, approached the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court complaining that although it had supplied Fo...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/s. Sri Lalitha Construction Products, represented by its Partner Mr. Thota Venugopal, challenged a Re-Auction Public Notice dated 06.12.2023 issued by the first respondent proposing t...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/s. Hilton Garden Inn, a unit of MPG Hotels and Infrastructure Ventures Pvt. Ltd., holding GSTIN 32AAECM1840M3ZI granted on 28.06.2017, challenged an order directing it to remit intere...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, Raghunath Panigrahi, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Orissa at Cuttack against the Commissioner of CT & GST, Odisha and others, raising a GST-related grievance. The matte...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/S. K.V. Hanchinal, a Class One Contractor holding GSTIN 29AAGFK8411R2ZL, filed a writ petition before the Dharwad Bench of the Karnataka High Court challenging the constitutional vali...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, Vadakkedath Sanilan, proprietor of S.B. Medicals, Nileswaram, Kasaragod District, challenged a show cause notice dated 05.07.2021, the consequential order along with a demand in Form GS...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, M/S Ritvik Steel Private Limited, through its Director Mr. Amit Kumar, had its goods detained and an order passed against it on 16.09.2021 in exercise of power under Section 129 of the ...
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, Hercules Automobiles International (P) Ltd., represented by its Managing Director, had multiple best-judgment assessment orders passed against it under Section 62 of the CGST/SGST Act, ...