Facts of the Case
The
petitioner, M/s. Prince Seafoods Exports, is a proprietary concern
represented by its proprietor, S. Irudayaraj, dealing in seafood exports
out of Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu.
The...
Facts of the Case
Tender
Invitation and Parties Involved: The District Rural
Development Agency (DRDA), Pudukkottai, invited tenders for the public
infrastructure project concerning the construction o...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. D. Lingam Medicals,
represented by its proprietor D. Devaraj, filed a writ petition under Article
226 of the Constitution of India challenging the assessment order dated 22.12.202...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, M/s Zeus India, represented
by its proprietor Shri Syed Gulsheer, approached the Karnataka High Court under
Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the
adjudicat...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, M/s AMK Athencottasan Muthamizh
Kazhagam Man Power Services, represented by its Director R. Arul Kannan,
filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
challengi...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Sanarpatti Panchayath,
represented by its Special Officer/BDO P. Kamaraj, approached the Madurai Bench
of the Madras High Court challenging the cancellation of its GST registration.The...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. Punitha Antony Store,
represented by its proprietor Rajaprakash, challenged an assessment order dated
19.01.2026 relating to Assessment Year 2025-26. The assessment
was passed ex...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner No. 1, M/s Metal Syndicate,
is a proprietorship firm having its registered office at Kathal Road, Silchar,
Assam, and petitioner No. 2 is its proprietor, Sri Dipak Kangsa Banik.The peti...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. Manickavasagam S.,
filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
challenging the impugned assessment order dated 24.02.2026 passed by the
respondent, The P...
Facts of the
CaseM/s. Raamdev Logistics filed a writ petition before
the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court challenging the impugned order dated
22.12.2025 passed by the first respondent, the State Tax Officer, Tu...