Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,215,509
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters

M/s. Prince Seafoods Exports Vs. The State Tax Officer (Roving Squad 1), Tirunelveli: Madras High Court Quashes Ex-Parte Assessment Order Passed Under Section 74A of TNGST Act 2017 Over Portal-Only Notice Uploads and RCM Freight Discrepancies, Remanding the Matter for Fresh Consideration Upon 25% Pre-Deposit

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 80
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, M/s. Prince Seafoods Exports, is a proprietary concern represented by its proprietor, S. Irudayaraj, dealing in seafood exports out of Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu. The...

P. Ganesan vs. The Director, Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption & Others: High Court Mandates Strict Timeline under Section 17-A of Prevention of Corruption Act and Rejects Onerous, Favoritistic Tender Conditions in Public Infrastructure Contracts

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 116
Read More »
Facts of the Case Tender Invitation and Parties Involved: The District Rural Development Agency (DRDA), Pudukkottai, invited tenders for the public infrastructure project concerning the construction o...

Tvl. D. Lingam Medicals vs Deputy State Tax Officer-2 – Madras High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Section 73 TNGST Assessment for Alleged Suppressed Sales; Section 22 Registration Threshold and Jurisdiction Plea to Be Reconsidered Without 25% Pre-Deposit

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 79
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. D. Lingam Medicals, represented by its proprietor D. Devaraj, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the assessment order dated 22.12.202...

M/s Zeus India vs State of Karnataka – Karnataka High Court Quashes Section 73(1) GST DRC-07 Order in Part for Reconsideration of ITC Claimed Through Returns Filed Before 30.11.2021 | Section 16(5) KGST Act

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 89
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Zeus India, represented by its proprietor Shri Syed Gulsheer, approached the Karnataka High Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the adjudicat...

M/s AMK Athencottasan Muthamizh Kazhagam Man Power Services vs State Tax Officer – Madras High Court Sets Aside Section 62 TNGST Best Judgment Assessment After Filing of Returns; Returns Must Be Considered in Reassessment | MANS Nadar and Co. Case Followed

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 123
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s AMK Athencottasan Muthamizh Kazhagam Man Power Services, represented by its Director R. Arul Kannan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengi...

Sanarpatti Panchayath vs Commercial Tax Officer – Madras High Court Sets Aside GST Registration Cancellation Order and Directs Revival Subject to Compliance with Tvl. Suguna Cutpiece Center Conditions | Article 226, CGST/TNGST Act

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 74
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Sanarpatti Panchayath, represented by its Special Officer/BDO P. Kamaraj, approached the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court challenging the cancellation of its GST registration.The...

Tvl. Punitha Antony Store vs State Tax Officer (Roving Squad-2) – Madras High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte GST Assessment on 25% Disputed Tax Deposit; GSTR-3B vs GSTR-2A ITC Mismatch Due to Suppliers Reporting B2C Instead of B2B | Sections 73

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 76
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. Punitha Antony Store, represented by its proprietor Rajaprakash, challenged an assessment order dated 19.01.2026 relating to Assessment Year 2025-26. The assessment was passed ex...

M/s Metal Syndicate & Anr. vs Union of India & Ors. – Gauhati High Court Quashes ₹78.70 Lakh GST ITC Demand; Bona Fide Purchaser Cannot Be Denied ITC for Supplier’s Failure to Deposit Tax Under Sections 16(2)(c), 16(2)(d), 50, 74(1) & 122 of CGST Act, 2017

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 97
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner No. 1, M/s Metal Syndicate, is a proprietorship firm having its registered office at Kathal Road, Silchar, Assam, and petitioner No. 2 is its proprietor, Sri Dipak Kangsa Banik.The peti...

Tvl. Manickavasagam S. vs The Proper Officer/Commercial Tax Officer – Madras High Court Sets Aside Section 74 TNGST Assessment on GST Levy on Seigniorage Fees; Reply Not Considered and Final Demand Kept in Abeyance Pending Supreme Court Judgment

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 80
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. Manickavasagam S., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the impugned assessment order dated 24.02.2026 passed by the respondent, The P...

M/s. Raamdev Logistics vs State Tax Officer, Tuticorin-III Circle & Anr. – Madras High Court Sets Aside GST Assessment Order for Fresh Adjudication Subject to 25% Disputed Tax Deposit and Directs Defreezing of Bank Account

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 89
Read More »
Facts of the CaseM/s. Raamdev Logistics filed a writ petition before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court challenging the impugned order dated 22.12.2025 passed by the first respondent, the State Tax Officer, Tu...