Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,215,725
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters

Shahjad vs Commissioner, State Goods and Services Tax – Uttarakhand High Court Permits GST Registration Revocation Application After Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns; WPMB No. 39 of 2025 Followed Subject to Pending Returns, Unpaid Tax, Interest and Penalty

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 88
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Shahjad, approached the Uttarakhand High Court challenging the order dated 05.07.2025 whereby his GST registration had been cancelled.The specific ground for cancellation recorded by ...

Tvl. VARS Enterprises vs Assistant Commissioner (State Tax) – Madras High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Section 73 TNGST Assessment on GSTR-3B vs GSTR-2A ITC Mismatch; Circular No. 183/15/2022 Reconciliation Claim to Be Reconsidered Subject to 25% Disputed Tax Deposit

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 99
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. VARS Enterprises, represented by its partner A. Ramanathan, approached the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.The petitioner cha...

R. Ramesh vs Deputy State Tax Officer-1 – Madras High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Section 73 TNGST DRC-07 Order on Section 17(5) Blocked ITC Dispute for Iron and Steel Used by Civil Works Contractor; Fresh Adjudication Subject to 25% Disputed Tax Deposit

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 92
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, R. Ramesh, represented by its proprietor Ramasamy Ramesh, approached the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.The petitioner challenged...

Tvl. VARS Enterprises vs Assistant Commissioner (State Tax) – Madras High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Section 73 TNGST Assessment on GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B Reconciliation, GSTR-3B vs GSTR-2A ITC Mismatch and Section 16(4) Time-Bar; 25% Deposit Excludes Section 16(5) ITC Issue

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 99
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. VARS Enterprises, represented by its partner A. Ramanathan, approached the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.The petitioner cha...

Batik Air Services Pvt Ltd Vs Union Of India And Ors: Delhi High Court On Unfreezing Of Bank Accounts Under Article 226 Of The Constitution Of India Involving Writ Seeking De-Freezing For Airline Operational Expenses And Statutory Dues

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 102
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Petitioner, Batik Air Services Pvt Ltd, preferred a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Delhi. This petition was filed challe...

Tvl. Amman Arul Spinners vs. The Deputy Commissioner (CT) (GST) (Appeals), Erode and Salem & Anr. | Condonation of Delay Under Section 107 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 – Restoring Ex-Parte Assessment Orders on Merits Pending Bonafide Rectification Applications Under Section 161 – Madras High Court Judgment

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 92
Read More »
Facts of the Case Issuance of Notice: A Show Cause Notice (SCN) was issued to the petitioner, Tvl. Amman Arul Spinners, on November 25, 2024, proposing the imposition of tax, interest, and penalty bas...

M/s Ramky Speciality Chemicals and Equipment Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax: Karnataka High Court Quashes Ex-Parte Order-in-Original Passed Under Finance Act, 1994, Without Due Service of Notice Based on CBDT-CBIC Data Sharing Agreement, Citing Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Remanding the Matter for Fresh Adjudication

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 94
Read More »
Facts of the Case Petitioner Status: The petitioner, M/s Ramky Speciality Chemicals and Equipment, is a proprietary concern (represented by its proprietor, Shri. Vajrala Ram Krishna) originally regist...

Tvl. CS Timbers and Lorry Service Vs. The State Tax Officer: Madras High Court Quashes Ex-Parte GST Assessment Order Issued Under Section 73 of TNGST Act 2017 Involving Input Tax Credit (ITC) Reversal on By-Products (Firewood) and Remands Matter for Fresh Hearing on Merits

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 96
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Petitioner's Profile: The petitioner, Tvl. CS Timbers and Lorry Service, represented by its Proprietor C. Selvin Lal, is a small-scale trader registered under GST laws, engaged i...

Tvl.V.N.S. Construction vs. The State Tax Officer (Review) | Whether Ex-Parte Assessment Order under Section 74 of TNGST/CGST Act Valid if Turnover Difference is Solely Based on GSTR-7 TDS and Services are Exempt Pure Services

Author
HARDEV SINGH
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 185
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Petitioner's Profile: The Petitioner, Tvl.V.N.S. Construction, is a small-scale contractor represented by its Proprietor, K. Vetrivel, engaged in civil construction and maintenan...

Tvl.V.N.S.Construction vs. The State Tax Officer (Review) | Quashing of Cryptic Ex-Parte GST Assessment Order Under Section 74 of TNGST Act Due to Failure to Evaluate Tax Exemptions for Public Water Supply Schemes and Misplaced Reliance on GSTR-7 TDS Data

Author
My Tax Expert
03/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 89
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Petitioner: Tvl.V.N.S.Construction is a proprietary concern engaged in execute-level contract works. Nature of Operations: The petitioner rendered operations and mainten...