Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters
Naresh Women Hair Enterprises vs State of Telangana & Others: Telangana High Court Dismisses Challenge to 18% GST Condition on Highest Bid for Human Hair (Tala Neelalu) Tender as Infructuous After Tender Finalised in Favour of Third Parties; GST Exemption Grounds Left Open – Article 226, Articles 14 & 19(1)(g) of the Constitution
Facts of the
Case
The petitioner, Naresh Women Hair Enterprises,
represented by its proprietor Ch. Naresh, filed the writ petition challenging
the action of Respondent No. 3, Sri Anjaneya Swamy Vari Devasthanam,
K...
M/s Ramky Speciality Chemicals and Equipment vs Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax — Karnataka High Court Quashes Ex Parte Service Tax Order for Lack of Notice and Opportunity; Fresh Adjudication Directed Despite Nearly Three-Year Delay
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, M/s Ramky Speciality Chemicals
and Equipment, challenged an Order-in-Original dated 28.12.2022/29.12.2022
passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax under the Finance Act,
19...
M/s Span Pumps Private Limited Vs The Union of India & Others: Patna High Court Condoned GST Appeal Delay Due to COVID-19 Restrictions and Ordered De-Freezing of Bank Accounts Under Section 107 of the CGST Act
Facts of the Case
Assessment
Order and Liability: The Assistant Commissioner of State
Tax, Patna Special Central, passed an ex parte assessment order dated
07.03.2020 and a subsequent demand order in ...
Tvl. V.N.S. Construction vs State Tax Officer (Review) – Madras High Court: Ex Parte GST Assessment for GSTR-7 vs GSTR-3B Turnover Difference Set Aside; Pure Services to TWAD Board Treated as GST-Exempt for Grant of Unconditional Reassessment Opportunity under Section 74A of TNGST Act
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. V.N.S. Construction,
challenged the assessment order dated 29.01.2026 relating to the
assessment year 2024-25. The writ petition sought quashing of the
impugned assessment order ...
Moitheensha vs Station House Officer, Chadayamangalam Police Station & Others: Kerala High Court Grants Police Protection for Loading and Unloading of Wooden Logs by Petitioner’s Own Workers Where No Operational Headload Workers Scheme Is in Force – Rule 26A of the Kerala Headload Workers Rules, 1981 and Kerala Headload Workers Act, 1978
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Moitheensha, was conducting
a business establishment under the name Saj Traders. The writ petition
was filed seeking police protection for the petitioner’s life and property, for
th...
M/s Manipal Energy And Infratech Limited & Anr. Versus Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (AVVNL) & Anr. — Validity of Debarment/Blacklisting Orders Issued Without Specific Show-Cause Notice Specifying the Proposed Penalty and Violation of Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 46 of the Rajasthan Transparency in Public Procurement (RTPP) Act, 2012
Facts of the Case
The
Tender and Joint Venture: A Joint Venture (JV)
agreement was executed between M/s Manipal Energy And Infratech Limited
(MEIL) and M/s K.S. Projects to participate in a turn-key t...
Tvl. V.N.S. Construction vs State Tax Officer (Review) – Madras High Court Sets Aside Section 74 TNGST Assessment on Alleged GSTR-7 vs GSTR-3B/GSTR-9 Turnover Mismatch; GST-Exempt Public Water Supply O&M Services Remanded Without Pre-Deposit Condition
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. V.N.S. Construction,
represented by its Proprietor K. Vetrivel, challenged the assessment order
dated 29.01.2026 passed by the respondent under Section 74 of the TNGST Act,
2017 ...
M/s V.V. Enterprises vs. Union of India and Others: High Court Quashes Retrospective Cancellation of GST Registration Under Section 29 of CGST Act Due to Failure to Supply Relied-Upon Evidence and Violation of Principles of Natural Justice
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner, M/s V.V. Enterprises, was a registered entity under the Goods
and Services Tax (GST) framework.
The
respondent authorities issued a Show Cause Notice (SCN) proposi...
M/S Super Drillers vs State of Tripura & Others – Undisputed Final Bill and Security Money Must Be Released to Proprietorship Firm Without Insisting on Succession Certificate | Article 226 of the Constitution of India | WP(C) No. 51 of 2022
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner approached the High Court of Tripura
seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents, particularly respondent
No. 3, to pay and release the undisputed final bill and security money...
Tarun Enterprises vs. State of Punjab and Others: Retrospective Cancellation of GST Registration Without Show Cause Notice Under Section 29 of CGST Act Violates Principles of Natural Justice and is Bad in Law — A Detailed Analysis of Punjab & Haryana High Court’s Landmark Judgment Relying on M/s Bansal Casting
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner, M/s Tarun Enterprises, approached the Hon’ble High
Court of Punjab and Haryana challenging an impugned order dated 23.09.2025
(Annexure P-2).
Via
this impu...