Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters
Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu vs Sun Pharmaceutical Industries: J&K and Ladakh High Court Dismisses Section 35G Appeal on Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess Refund to Maintain Parity with Earlier Batch Judgment
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu filed the
present appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against
an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, ...
Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu vs Sun Pharmaceutical – Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 – High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal on Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess Refund to Maintain Parity with Earlier Coordinate Bench Judgment
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Jammu filed the
present appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against
an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal,...
Navrang Infrastructures Inc. vs Commissioner, CGST & Anr. – Refund of ₹8.70 Lakh Service Tax Deposited on Construction of BPL Houses | High Court Directs Decision on Representation Within Two Months
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Navrang Infrastructures Inc., was a
proprietorship concern stated to be engaged in construction activities.The petitioner had constructed flats for the Haryana Housing
Board. According ...
M/s Jyothy Constructions vs Kerala Water Authority — GST Reimbursement Claim for Government Contract Work and Direction to Decide Contractor’s Representation | WP(C) No. 9266 of 2022
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Jyothy Constructions, was an ‘A’
Class Government Contractor and had successfully participated in a bidding
process concerning work awarded by the Kerala Water Authority. Pursua...
Ramar Andavar vs Assistant Commissioner (Circle): Madras High Court Allows Revival of Cancelled GST Registration Under Section 29 of the CGST Act for Non-Filing of Returns
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Ramar Andavar, filed a writ petition under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the respondent’s order
bearing Reference No. ZA3305221035161 dated 25.05.2022. The peti...
Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu vs M/s Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. — Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944: High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal Against Refund of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu filed the
present appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against
an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, ...
Shree Jagannath Construction vs Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha & Others: Orissa High Court Condones Delay Under Proviso to Rule 23 of OGST Rules and Directs Consideration of GST Registration Revocation Application Subject to Payment of Tax, Interest, Late Fee and Penalty
Facts of the CaseShree Jagannath Construction filed a writ petition before the
High Court of Orissa at Cuttack in relation to the delayed filing of an
application for revocation under the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odis...
Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Jammu vs M/s Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Bari Brahna, Jammu – Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 – High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal on Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess Refund to Maintain Parity with Earlier Coordinate Bench Judgment
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Jammu filed an
appeal before the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Jammu under Section
35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against an order co...
M/s Sagar Marketing vs Okaya Power Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. – Delhi High Court: Territorial Jurisdiction Under Order VII Rule 10 CPC Must Be Determined on Plaint Averments; Disputed Cause of Action Is a Triable Issue
Facts of the CaseM/s Sagar Marketing filed an appeal before the Delhi High
Court challenging the order dated 08 September 2022 passed by the learned
Commercial Court. By the impugned order, the Commercial Court had rej...
M/s Sagar Marketing vs Okaya Power Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. – Delhi High Court: Territorial Jurisdiction Under Order VII Rule 10 CPC Must Be Determined on Plaint Averments; Disputed Cause of Action Is a Triable Issue
Facts of the CaseM/s Sagar Marketing filed an appeal before the Delhi High
Court challenging the order dated 08 September 2022 passed by the learned
Commercial Court. By the impugned order, the Commercial Court had rej...