Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Gagan Sahoo, approached the High Court
of Orissa in W.P.(C) No. 11689 of 2022 in connection with the delayed filing of
an application for revocation under the proviso to Rule 23 of the ...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, namely Momtaj Ali @ Momta Ali and Johur
Ali, were arrested on 24.09.2022 in connection with Sarupathar
P.S. Case No. 45/2022, registered under Sections 120(B), 379, 411, 406,
413 and ...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Sanctum Innovations and Solutions Pvt.
Ltd., approached the Telangana High Court under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, challenging the cancellation of its GST registration...
Facts of the CaseM/s Unique Industrial Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. approached the
Telangana High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging
action connected with goods valued at approximately ₹8,50,47...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Hamsa N.A., had availed three
separate loans from the respondent Bank. Upon default by the petitioner,
the Bank initiated proceedings under the provisions of the Securitisation
and Rec...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Smt. Sunitha Reddy Kompally, proprietor
of M/s. Zentronics Systems, filed a writ petition under Article 226
of the Constitution of India before the Telangana High Court challenging
the...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner,
Sheena M.S., was the holder of a licence in Form LE-1 issued by the
Additional District Magistrate, Thrissur under the Explosives Rules, 2008.
She participated in the re-e-tender proc...
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s. Laxmi Trading Company, was a
proprietorship firm engaged in milling and trading different kinds of dals and
pulses. It procured dals and pulses from the open market within Telangan...
Facts of the
CaseGRV Packages
Private Limited, a private limited company incorporated in the year 2021, was
promoted by its shareholders for establishing a small-scale industry for
manufacturing corrugated boxes used...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Tvl.
Velmani Crusher, was a registered person under the GST law. The petitioner
failed to file GSTR-3B returns for a period of six months.Consequently, the
second respondent, namely t...