Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,217,553
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters

Srinivas V. vs Union of India – Karnataka High Court: Service Tax Quantified Before 30 June 2019 Eligible for SVLDRS 2019 Benefit Under Section 123(c) Despite Pending Investigation

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 121
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, Srinivas V., approached the Karnataka High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. On 12 September 2018, the respondents issued a notice intimating th...

M/s Sri Anjaneya Electrical and Civil Works vs Union of India – Telangana High Court Sets Aside GST Registration Cancellation and Time-Barred Appellate Order; Fresh Decision Directed Following Nitya Construction and Chenna Krishnamacharyulu

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 110
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, M/s Sri Anjaneya Electrical and Civil Works, was a proprietorship concern engaged in executing electrical and civil works, including installation of electrical poles ...

Skyline Builders vs Union of India & Others — Kerala High Court Dismisses GST Writ Petition as Withdrawn

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 121
Read More »
Facts of the CaseSkyline Builders, represented by its Managing Partner Mr. K.V. Abdul Azeez, filed WP(C) No. 1156 of 2020 before the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam against the Union of India and various GST-related au...

A.J. Annakutty vs Intelligence Officer (IB) – Kerala High Court: Pending Revenue Appeal Cannot Bar KVAT Amnesty Scheme 2020 Benefit Under Section 10(11) of Kerala Finance Act, 2020

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 126
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, A.J. Annakutty, was the proprietress of Anjali Broilers, described in the proceedings as defunct. The petitioner had arrears arising under the Kerala Value Added Ta...

M/s Hanuman Agro Products vs Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes – Karnataka High Court Directs Reconsideration of GST Registration Revocation Without Reference to Limitation in Special Circumstances

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 131
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, M/s Hanuman Agro Products, approached the High Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner’s GST registration had been cancelled...

Parveez Ahmad Baba vs Union Territory of J&K & Others – GST Registration Cancellation and FSSAI Licence Dispute: High Court Sets Aside Restraint on Competent Authority and Directs Fresh Decision on Individual Claims

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 112
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appellant, Parveez Ahmad Baba, challenged the judgment/final order passed by the Writ Court in WP(C) No. 1997/2021. The original writ petition had questioned three principal actions.First, the appe...

Panakkathottam Agro Rubber Park vs Assistant Commissioner of State Tax & Connected Appeals – Kerala High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals as Not Pressed

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 104
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA batch of eight writ appeals was placed before the Kerala High Court. The appeals arose from judgments passed in separate writ petitions concerning different appellants and State tax/GST authorities.T...

M/s FortuneArrt LED Lighting Pvt. Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner of Central Tax & Others – Telangana High Court Dismisses as Withdrawn Challenge to Rule 89(5) of CGST/TGST Rules on Refund of Unutilized ITC of Input Services in Inverted Duty Structure

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 109
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, M/s FortuneArrt LED Lighting Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Director, filed two writ petitions before the Telangana High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.The Petition...

BPT Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. vs Indraprastha Ice and Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. – Delhi High Court Appoints Arbitrator Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act; Disputed Full and Final Settlement, Economic Duress and Unresolved ₹1.83 Crore Claims Held Arbitrable

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 119
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, BPT Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbitrator for adjudication of disputes with t...

Punati Vengaiah vs State of Telangana and Another – Telangana High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against A83 Under Section 482 CrPC in ₹70.69 Crore Deposit and Chit Fund Case Involving Sections 406 & 420 IPC, Section 5 of Telangana Protection of Depositors Act, Section 76 of Chit Funds Act and RBI Act

Author
My Tax Expert
07/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 118
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Punati Vengaiah, who was shown as A83 in Crime No. 213 of 2018 of Shankerpally Police Station, approached the Telangana High Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure s...