Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Khalid Ahmed Ghilan Amran, a national
of Yemen, initially obtained admission in the M.Tech. (Upstream) Course in
Petroleum Engineering at NIMS University, Jaipur, in 2013 and comp...
Facts of the
CaseM/s Jai Mateshwari Steels Pvt. Ltd. preferred
Special Appeal Nos. 341 of 2022 and 342 of 2022 before the High Court of
Uttarakhand against orders dated 15 September 2022 passed by the learned Single
...
Facts of the CaseM/s Reliable Homes, a partnership firm engaged in the business
of construction, building and development of residential complexes, was
registered with the Service Tax Department under the category of â...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Conceptial Trade, was
engaged in the business of trading products such as garments, footwear and
leather accessories. It operated from Mumbai, Maharashtra, and asserted that it
had no...
Facts of the
CaseM/s. ESL Steel Limited, earlier known as M/s.
Electrosteel Steels Limited, made supplies intended for export to M/s. Bharat
Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL). The supplies were connected with the
conc...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Arham Marbles at Kelwa,
Rajsamand, approached the Rajasthan High Court by filing D.B. Civil Writ
Petition No. 12490/2022. The writ petition challenged the impugned
orders/notice issue...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, M/s. Esveeaar Distilleries Private
Limited, was engaged in the manufacture of Indian Made Foreign Liquor at its
distillery situated at Karakambadi Village, Chittoor District. It was a
...
Facts of the
CaseMayflower Hotels and Resorts LLP was an assessee
registered under the GST laws. The petitioner failed to submit GST returns for
the period from the year 2018 up to the year 2021.As a consequence of su...
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Pragati Srivastava, was working as
an Assistant Teacher in Primary School, Chuppepur Development Area, Chakia,
District Chandauli. She sought an inter-district transfer from the said s...
Facts of the
CaseM/s. Royal Blue Hotels (P) Ltd. suffered assessment
orders for the assessment years 2015-16 and 2016-17. The petitioner challenged
those assessment orders before the first appellate authority.The firs...