Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters
Shahjad vs Commissioner, State Goods and Services Tax – Uttarakhand High Court Permits GST Registration Revocation Application After Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns; WPMB No. 39 of 2025 Followed Subject to Pending Returns, Unpaid Tax, Interest and Penalty
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Shahjad, approached the
Uttarakhand High Court challenging the order dated 05.07.2025 whereby
his GST registration had been cancelled.The specific ground for cancellation recorded by
...
M/s. Merco Engineers Private Limited vs Additional Commissioner, Ranga Reddy GST Commissionerate & Union of India – Service Tax Demand Quashed for Violation of Natural Justice | Section 73(2), Finance Act, 1994 read with Section 174 of the CGST Act, 2017
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s. Merco Engineers Private
Limited, challenged the legality and validity of the Order-in-Original
dated 08.03.2022, whereby the Additional Commissioner confirmed a Service
Tax demand...
Tvl. VARS Enterprises vs Assistant Commissioner (State Tax) – Madras High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Section 73 TNGST Assessment on GSTR-3B vs GSTR-2A ITC Mismatch; Circular No. 183/15/2022 Reconciliation Claim to Be Reconsidered Subject to 25% Disputed Tax Deposit
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. VARS Enterprises,
represented by its partner A. Ramanathan, approached the Madurai Bench of the
Madras High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.The petitioner cha...
M/s. Suvarna Traders vs Assistant Commissioner of State Tax & Others – Telangana High Court | Section 75(4) & Section 169 CGST Act | Personal Hearing Mandatory Before GST Assessment Order
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s. Suvarna Traders,
challenged the assessment order dated 05.05.2022 passed by the Assistant
Commissioner (State Tax), Maredpally Circle, Hyderabad, whereby excess Input
Tax Credit (...
M/s Manjeet Cotton Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of State Tax | Gujarat High Court | Section 73, Section 75(4), Section 79 & Section 107 of CGST/GGST Act | Delay in Appeal Condoned – Opportunity of Hearing Already Availed
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, M/s Manjeet Cotton Pvt. Ltd.,
engaged in the business of trading in cotton bales, cotton yarn and allied
products, received a Show Cause Notice under Section 73 of the CGST/GGST Act
a...
M/s. KVR Steel Orissa Ltd. vs The Sales Tax Officer, Balasore Circle & Others – Orissa High Court | Assessment Order Challenge | Availability of Statutory Appeal | W.P.(C) No. 21684 of 2016
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, M/s. KVR Steel Orissa Ltd.,
challenged the assessment order dated 29.09.2016 passed by the Sales
Tax Officer, Balasore Circle, Balasore before the Orissa High Court by
filing a writ p...
Rajiv Dutta vs State of Punjab | Anticipatory Bail Granted on Parity in GST Tax Evasion Scam | Sections 438 CrPC, 7, 7A & 8 Prevention of Corruption Act, Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 201 & 120-B IPC | Punjab & Haryana High Court
Facts of the CaseThe petitions were filed seeking anticipatory bail
under Section 438 CrPC in connection with FIR No. 8 dated 21.08.2020 registered
by the Vigilance Bureau, Punjab, relating to an alleged GST tax ...
R. Ramesh vs Deputy State Tax Officer-1 – Madras High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Section 73 TNGST DRC-07 Order on Section 17(5) Blocked ITC Dispute for Iron and Steel Used by Civil Works Contractor; Fresh Adjudication Subject to 25% Disputed Tax Deposit
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, R. Ramesh, represented by
its proprietor Ramasamy Ramesh, approached the Madurai Bench of the Madras High
Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.The petitioner challenged...
Tvl. VARS Enterprises vs Assistant Commissioner (State Tax) – Madras High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Section 73 TNGST Assessment on GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B Reconciliation, GSTR-3B vs GSTR-2A ITC Mismatch and Section 16(4) Time-Bar; 25% Deposit Excludes Section 16(5) ITC Issue
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. VARS Enterprises,
represented by its partner A. Ramanathan, approached the Madurai Bench of the
Madras High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.The petitioner cha...
Tvl. D. Lingam Medicals vs Deputy State Tax Officer-2 – Madras High Court Sets Aside Ex Parte Section 73 TNGST Assessment for Alleged Suppressed Sales; Section 22 Registration Threshold and Jurisdiction Plea to Be Reconsidered Without 25% Pre-Deposit
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, Tvl. D. Lingam Medicals,
represented by its proprietor D. Devaraj, filed a writ petition under Article
226 of the Constitution of India challenging the assessment order dated 22.12.202...