Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters
Mumbai Furniture, Bisra Road, Rourkela vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Odisha & Others – Orissa High Court Dismisses Writ Petition for Non-Prosecution Due to Non-Appearance of Petitioner | Article 226 of the Constitution of India
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Mumbai Furniture, Bisra Road,
Rourkela, had filed a writ petition before the Orissa High Court under Article
226 of the Constitution of India challenging proceedings involving the Commi...
M/s. Damas Kaushal Food and Beverages vs The Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack-I & Others – Orissa High Court Permits Withdrawal of Writ Petition; Petition Dismissed as Withdrawn | Article 226 of the Constitution of India
Facts of the
CaseM/s. Damas Kaushal Food and Beverages filed a writ
petition before the Orissa High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India against the Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack-I and other authorities. ...
M/s Yentop Manickam Edible Oils Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise – Madras High Court Sets Aside Rejection of Ocean Freight Service Tax Refund, Orders Fresh Consideration in Light of Mohit Minerals Judgment
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Yentop Manickam Edible Oils
Private Limited, had paid service tax under the Reverse Charge Mechanism
(RCM) on ocean freight for the month of June 2017. Subsequently, the petitioner
...
M/s. Manickavel Edible Oils Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise – Madras High Court Sets Aside Rejection of Ocean Freight Service Tax Refund Claim, Orders Fresh Examination in Light of Mohit Minerals Judgment | Article 226 of the Constitution of India
Facts of the
CaseThe petitioner, M/s. Manickavel Edible Oils
Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the Order-in-Original
dated 13.10.2022, whereby the respondent rejected its refund claim for service
tax...
Premananda Sahoo vs State of Odisha – Orissa High Court Holds Onerous Cash Security Cannot Be Imposed for Release of Seized Goods; Property Security Directed Instead under Sections 457 & 482 Cr.P.C. in GST Evasion Allegations
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged the order passed by the
learned S.D.J.M., Puri, whereby the seized scrap copper wires were directed to
be released in his favour. However, the release was made subject to the
...
Sankar Lal Sahoo vs State of Odisha – Orissa High Court Remands Matter for Fresh Inquiry on Release of Seized Iron Scrap under Section 457 Cr.P.C.; Ownership Cannot Be Rejected Solely for Absence of E-Way Bill
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Sankar Lal Sahoo, challenged
the order dated 02.09.2020 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Panposh,
Rourkela in Criminal Misc. Case No. 166 of 2020 whereby his application under Section
4...
M/s Contractor vs State of Andhra Pradesh & Others – Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs Release of Pending Contractor Bills with 12% Interest for Completed Government Work | Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Clauses 68 & 69 of AP Standard Specifications
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, a registered civil contractor, was
awarded the work of construction of "Sampradayam Kala Gurukulam at
Kallepalli Village" through the e-tender process pursuant to Agreement
No. 01/JNTU...
M/s. Dolphin Inks Pvt. Ltd. vs Joint Commissioner (Appeals) & Others – Bombay High Court Holds COVID-19 Limitation Exclusion Applicable to GST Refund Claims under Section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017
Facts of the CaseM/s. Dolphin Inks Pvt. Ltd. filed refund
applications under Section 54(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 in respect of the
tax period relating to June 2019. The refund applications were submitted on 28
August ...
Mohd. Vikki vs State of Uttar Pradesh – Bail Granted in Theft & House-Breaking Case under Sections 380, 457 & 411 IPC | Allahabad High Court
Facts of the CaseThe present bail application was filed by Mohd.
Vikki seeking regular bail in Case Crime No. 103 of 2022, registered
under Sections 380, 457 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code at Police
Station Govind N...
Barbrik Projects Ltd. vs Union of India & Others – Reassessment under Sections 147, 148 & 148A Upheld on Tangible Information of Bogus Purchase Accommodation Entries | Chhattisgarh High Court
Facts of the CaseThe appellant, Barbrik Projects Ltd.,
engaged in civil construction work, filed its income tax return for AY
2018-19 under Section 139(1). The return was scrutinized and an assessment
under Section 14...