Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,219,068
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters

A.J. Augustine vs State of Kerala & Others: Section 143(3) of Negotiable Instruments Act Mandates Expeditious Trial of Section 138 Cheque Dishonour Cases; Kerala High Court Directs Disposal Within Three Months

Author
My Tax Expert
17/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 84
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, A.J. Augustine, aged 85 years and proprietor of Kerala Trading Company, Nedumkandam, approached the Kerala High Court by filing three Original Petitions under Article 227 of the Const...

Binod Kumar Saw @ Binod Saw vs State of Bihar – Patna High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Section 7 Essential Commodities Act Case Involving Alleged Recovery of Subsidized Wheat and Rice

Author
My Tax Expert
17/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 74
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Binod Kumar Saw @ Binod Saw, apprehended arrest in connection with a criminal case registered for an offence punishable under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act.According to th...

Ram Kripal Singh Construction Pvt. Ltd. vs NTPC — Section 11(6) & Section 12(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 | Invalid Unilateral Arbitrator Appointment Procedure Is Severable and Does Not Void Arbitration Agreement: Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
17/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 78
Read More »
Facts of the CaseRam Kripal Singh Construction Pvt. Ltd., the petitioner, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbitrator for adjudication of dispu...

Satpal vs State of Haryana: Regular Bail Granted in Alleged Fake GST Firm and Cheating Case Under Sections 406, 419, 420, 465, 468, 471, 120-B & 201 IPC; Section 132 GST Act Deleted

Author
My Tax Expert
17/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 72
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Satpal, approached the Punjab and Haryana High Court seeking regular bail in FIR No. 345 dated 22.10.2020. The FIR was registered under Sections 406, 419, 420, 465, 468 and 471 of the ...

Mr. Udayasankar & Ms. Vasanthi vs Superintendent of GST and Central Excise: Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions as Withdrawn in Section 41 and 41A CrPC Custody Protection Matter

Author
My Tax Expert
17/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 63
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, Mr. Udayasankar in W.P.(MD) No. 8898 of 2021 and Ms. Vasanthi in W.P.(MD) No. 8899 of 2021, approached the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court by filing writ petitions under Artic...

M/s Bhanjadeo Constructions vs State of Odisha & Others – GST Differential Tax Reimbursement on Pre-GST Works Contracts: Orissa High Court Directs Consideration Under Revised Guidelines Dated 10.12.2018 and Grants Protection from Coercive Action

Author
My Tax Expert
17/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 83
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Bhanjadeo Constructions, approached the High Court challenging the action of the State authorities in not reimbursing the differential tax amount arising from the change in the tax...

Commissioner CGST and Central Excise (J&K), Jammu vs Zuventus Healthcare Ltd – Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1994: High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal on Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess Refund Following SRD Nutrients and Coordinate Bench Ruling

Author
My Tax Expert
17/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 73
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Commissioner CGST and Central Excise (J&K), Jammu filed an appeal before the High Court under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1994 against an order involving the respondent, Zuventus H...

M/s Chenab Textile Mills vs State of J&K and Others – Section 5 of J&K Levy of Tolls Act: Additional Toll Exemption Denied on Capital Goods Imported for Substantial Expansion; Statutory SRO Prevails Over Industrial Policy

Author
My Tax Expert
17/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 70
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s Chenab Textile Mills, was an industrial unit registered with the Department of Industries and Commerce. It had been established and permanently registered in 1966 and had undertak...

Adisan Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors. – Bombay High Court Quashes GST Refund Rejection Order for Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Service of Form GST RFD-08 Notice on GSTN Portal under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 92(3) of CGST Rules, 2017

Author
My Tax Expert
17/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 64
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Parties: Petitioner No. 1, Adisan Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., is a private limited company based in Pune, and Petitioner No. 2 is its Shareholder & Managing Director. The Respond...

Sheen Golden Jewels (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs State Tax Officer (IB)-1 & Others — Kerala High Court Upholds Section 174(2) of KSGST Act, 2017 and Continuation of KVAT Assessment, Reassessment, Penalty and Recovery Proceedings

Author
My Tax Expert
17/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 55
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appellants were dealers who had approached the Kerala High Court challenging proceedings initiated or continued by the State Tax authorities in relation to periods governed by the pre-GST Kerala Va...