Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters
Sri T.T. Venkataramana Reddy vs Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) – Karnataka High Court Directs Consideration of ₹1.19 Crore GST Reimbursement Claim with Applicable Interest under Section 50 of CGST Act, 2017
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Sri T.T. Venkataramana Reddy, approached the
High Court of Karnataka seeking a direction to the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara
Palike (BBMP) and its concerned Executive Engineer to reimbur...
EVM Premium Cars India Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India & Others – Kerala High Court: TCS Under Income-tax Act Not Includible in GST Taxable Value on Sale of Motor Vehicles | Section 15(2) of CGST Act
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, EVM Premium Cars India Pvt. Ltd.,
approached the Kerala High Court by filing WP(C) No. 6711 of 2019.The writ petition raised a specific question concerning the
determination of taxable ...
Niraj Singh @ Neeraj Kumar Singh vs State of Bihar – Patna High Court Highlights Systemic Failure in Implementation of Bihar Prohibition Law; Refers Matter for Public Interest Litigation | Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 & Article 47 of the Constitution
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner sought confirmation of the
provisional bail granted in connection with an offence registered under the
Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.During the hearing, the Court examined vario...
Rajasree Motors Pvt. Ltd. & Others vs Union of India & Others – Kerala High Court: TCS Collected Under Income-tax Act Not Includible in GST Taxable Value on Sale of Motor Vehicles | Section 15(2) of CGST Act
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioners, namely Rajasree Motors Pvt. Ltd.,
Manikandan Automobile Pvt. Ltd. and Manikandan Motor Pvt. Ltd., approached
the Kerala High Court by filing WP(C) No. 4868 of 2019.The writ petition ra...
Mind Mart vs State of Odisha & Another – Orissa High Court Sets Aside Blacklisting Order for Violation of Natural Justice; Premature Police Complaint Could Not Justify Adverse Inference | Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner, Mind Mart, approached the Orissa High
Court challenging an order by which the Petitioner firm had been blacklisted
from providing manpower in Jajpur District.The background of the dispu...
M/s Sri Sai Krishna Constructions & Connected Matters vs State of Jharkhand & Others – Jharkhand High Court Directs Time-Bound Decision on GST Differential Tax Reimbursement Claims in Pre-GST Works Contracts | GST on Ongoing Works Contracts | SOP Dated 26.08.2022
Facts
of the CaseA large number of contractors
executing Government works contracts in the State of Jharkhand approached the
High Court through several writ petitions raising a common grievance relating
to the ...
Popular Motor World Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India & Others: TCS Under Income-tax Act Not Includible in Taxable Value for GST Under Section 15(2) of CGST Act | Kerala High Court
Facts of the CasePopular Motor World Pvt. Ltd., engaged in the business of sale
of motor vehicles, approached the Kerala High Court raising the question
whether amounts collected as Tax Collected at Source (TCS) under ...
M/s Sri Sai Krishna Constructions vs State of Jharkhand — Differential GST Reimbursement on Pre-GST Works Contracts to Be Decided Under SOP dated 26.08.2022, Preferably Within 8 Weeks
Facts of the CaseA batch of writ petitions was filed before the
Jharkhand High Court by contractors and infrastructure entities whose works
contracts had been awarded during the pre-GST regime and remained subsisting o...
M/s SPK and Co vs State Tax Officer / Commercial Tax Officer — Madras High Court Keeps Section 74 TNGST Assessment and Bank Attachment Action in Abeyance on 18% GST over ₹23.70 Lakh Seigniorage Fee Pending Supreme Court Decision in Udaipur Chambers of Commerce and Industry vs Union of India
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, M/s SPK and Co, represented by its
Joint Managing Partner, approached the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court
under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.The writ petition sought ...
M/s Anasurya Traders vs State of Andhra Pradesh — Transmission Belting Qualifies for Tax Exemption Under Section 8 of the APGST Act Despite Entry 101 / Item 12 of the Sixth Schedule
Facts
of the CaseM/s
Anasurya Traders was a registered dealer on the rolls of the Commercial Tax
Officer, Main Bazar, Guntur, carrying on business in V-belts, transmission
belts and related goods. The dispute concern...