Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,216,757
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters

M/s Verve Human Care Laboratories & M/s Maan Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs Union of India & Central Medical Services Society (CMSS) – Delhi High Court Upholds Cancellation of Tender and Re-Tender Process; Limited Scope of Judicial Review in Government Contracts under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

Author
My Tax Expert
30/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 73
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners, M/s Verve Human Care Laboratories and M/s Maan Pharmaceuticals Ltd., challenged the decision of the Central Medical Services Society (CMSS) to cancel Tender No. CMSS/PROC/2021-22/NACO...

Pedda Kapu Narsi Reddy & Others vs Land Acquisition Officer, PJP Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District – Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation for Guava Trees in Land Acquisition Proceedings under Sections 18 & 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894

Author
My Tax Expert
30/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 65
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appellants, who were landowners, challenged the compensation awarded by the Reference Court in respect of guava trees standing on their acquired agricultural lands. The Government acquired their la...

C. Manogaran vs. The Commissioner/Additional Chief Secretary, Commercial Tax Department & Another – Madras High Court Directs GST Authority to Consider Objections on GST Demand for Seigniorage Charges in Mining Lease; Status Quo Ordered – Sections 7, 9(3) & 63 of the GST Act

Author
My Tax Expert
30/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 51
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, C. Manogaran, was declared the successful bidder in a tender floated by the District Collector under the Tamil Nadu Minor Mineral Concession Rules for obtaining a mining lease to conduc...

Pedda Kapu Narsi Reddy & Others vs. The Land Acquisition Officer, PJP Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District – Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation for Guava Trees While Upholding Land Value under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Section 54 Appeal)

Author
My Tax Expert
30/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 61
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appellants, who were landowners, challenged the judgment of the Reference Court relating to compensation awarded for their acquired lands and standing guava trees. Their agricultural lands situated...

M/s. Jhajjz Pvt. Ltd. & Others vs State (NCT of Delhi) & Others – Delhi High Court Quashes FIR under Sections 406 & 120B IPC Holding Commercial Contractual Dispute Cannot Be Converted into Criminal Proceedings through Forum Shopping

Author
My Tax Expert
30/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 52
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners approached the Delhi High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. 196/2021 regis...

Shiba Prasada Rath vs State of Odisha & Others – Orissa High Court Directs Authority to Decide Contractor’s Representation for Release of Admitted Final Bill Including GST Within Three Months

Author
My Tax Expert
30/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 54
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Petitioner filed a writ petition before the Orissa High Court seeking a direction to the concerned government authority to release the admitted final bill amounting to ₹4,78,139/- including GST ...

Muhammed Haris Rafeek & Anr. vs State of Kerala & Ors. – Kerala High Court Quashes GST Detention Order Passed Without Granting Opportunity of Hearing under Section 129 of the CGST/SGST Act

Author
My Tax Expert
30/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 58
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioners approached the Kerala High Court challenging the validity of a final order passed by the State Tax Authorities under Section 129(3) of the CGST/SGST Acts.The petitioners contended that ...

Dheeraj Kumar & 4 Others vs State of Uttar Pradesh – Allahabad High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Copyright Infringement Case Involving Alleged Sale of Pirated Spark Plugs under Sections 63 & 65 of the Copyright Act and Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Author
My Tax Expert
30/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 55
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with Case Crime No. 16 of 2020 registered under Sections 63 and 65 of the Copyright Act at Police Station ...

Hariom Gupta & Another vs State of Uttar Pradesh – Anticipatory Bail Granted in Copyright Infringement Case Involving Alleged Sale of Pirated Spark Plugs | Sections 63 & 65 of the Copyright Act, 1957 | Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Author
My Tax Expert
30/07/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 57
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe applicants, Hariom Gupta and Ramkumar Sharma, filed an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Case Crime No. 16 of 202...