Addition for Unexplained Cash Deposit Deleted — ITAT Allahabad in Gulab Singh v. ITO Clarifies Scope of Section 69A and Burden of Proo

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 150
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe assessee, an individual, was subjected to assessment proceedings during which the Assessing Officer noticed cash deposits in the bank account for the relevant assessment year. The deposits we...

Addition under Section 68 Deleted Where Identity, Creditworthiness and Genuineness of Gift Proven — ITAT in Shanti Devi v. ITO

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 146
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee received a sum of money as a gift through banking channels from an identifiable donor. During assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer treated the amount as unexplained cash credit ...

Ex-Parte Additions on Unsecured Loans, Expenses and Household Withdrawals Set Aside — ITAT Restores Matter for Fresh Adjudication in Amit Kumar Gupta v. ITO

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 174
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee was subjected to assessment proceedings which culminated in an ex-parte order due to alleged non-compliance with statutory notices. The Assessing Officer made multiple additions, includi...

Ex-Parte Assessment Set Aside for Lack of Opportunity — ITAT Restores Case to AO for Fresh Assessment in Amit Kumar Gupta v. ITO (ITA No. 40 & CO No. 7

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 148
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee was subjected to assessment proceedings wherein the Assessing Officer completed the assessment ex-parte due to non-appearance and alleged non-compliance by the assessee. Various additions...

Belated Return Bars Carry Forward of Business Loss but Not Unabsorbed Depreciation — ITAT Allahabad in Triveni Glass Ltd. v. ITO (AY 2012-13) Interpreting Sections 32(2), 72 & 139(3)

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 588
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a company engaged in manufacturing glass products, filed its return of income for the relevant assessment year belatedly, beyond the due date prescribed under Section 139(1) of the Inco...

Employees’ PF/ESI Contribution Paid Before Return Due Date Allowable — ITAT Allahabad in Commercial Auto Sales Pvt. Ltd. v. ADIT (CPC) on Sections 36(1)(va) & 43B

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 189
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a private limited company engaged in automobile business, filed its return of income declaring income under normal provisions. The return was processed under Section 143(1) by the Centra...

Addition on Cash Deposits Deleted Where Source Explained — ITAT Allahabad in Kusum Singh v. ITO (ITA No. 156/2019) on Section 69A

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 172
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe assessee, an individual, was subjected to scrutiny assessment during which the Assessing Officer noticed substantial cash deposits in her bank account during the relevant financial year. The ...

Write-Back of Government Non-Plan Loan Taxable as Income — ITAT Allahabad in Bharat Pumps & Compressors Ltd. v. DCIT (Reassessment u/s 147, AY 2007-08)

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 457
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a Government of India Public Sector Undertaking engaged in manufacturing pumps, compressors, and gas cylinders, filed its return of income declaring nil income for Assessment Year 2007-0...

Unexplained Cash Deposits & Fake Property Advance Story Rejected — ITAT Allahabad Upholds Addition u/s 143(3): Mrs. Shaheen Khan (Legal Heir of Late Ahmad Hussain Khan) vs ITO (AY 2009-10)

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 150
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed a return declaring income primarily from interest sources. The case was selected for scrutiny based on AIR information showing substantial cash deposits exceeding prescribed limits...

ACIT vs H. K. Infraventures Pvt. Ltd. — ITAT Allahabad Dismisses Revenue Appeal on Low Tax Effect as per CBDT Circular under Section 268A, Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 125
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal challenging the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) granting relief to the assessee. However, at the time of hearing, it was noted t...