Hindustan Power Projects Pvt. Ltd. vs Pr. CIT – No Disallowance u/s 14A Without Exempt Income | ITAT Delhi Quashes Revision u/s 263

Author
My Tax Expert
17/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 260
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Hindustan Power Projects Pvt. Ltd., filed appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench against revisionary orders passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income T...

M/s IREO Private Limited & Ors. vs. CIT (TDS)-1 – Section 263 Invalid When Issue is Debatable & Pending in Appeal | ITAT Delhi

Author
My Tax Expert
17/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 134
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee companies, engaged in real estate development, made payments towards External Development Charges (EDC) to HUDA on behalf of other entities. The Assessing Officer (AO), based on informat...

M/s IREO Private Limited & Ors. vs CIT (TDS)-1 – ITAT Delhi Quashes Section 263 Revision on EDC Payments to HUDA (TDS u/s 194C vs 194I Issue, Matter Pending before CIT(A))

Author
My Tax Expert
17/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 144
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee companies were engaged in real estate business and had made payments towards External Development Charges (EDC) to HUDA on behalf of other entities. During TDS verification, it was found...

Remand of Addition under Section 69 due to Lack of Proper Enquiry by CIT(A): ITAT Delhi in DCIT vs. Chaudhary Ventures Pvt. Ltd. (ITA No. 1968/Del/2024)

Author
My Tax Expert
17/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 136
Read More »
Remand of Addition under Section 69 due to Lack of Proper Enquiry by CIT(A): ITAT Delhi in DCIT vs. Chaudhary Ventures Pvt. Ltd. (ITA No. 1968/Del/2024)Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Chaudhary Ventures Pvt. Ltd., is ...

ITAT Delhi: Ex-Parte Assessment u/s 40(a)(ia) Set Aside – Matter Remanded for Fresh Opportunity | Nobel Overseas Ltd vs DCIT

Author
My Tax Expert
17/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 129
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Nobel Overseas Ltd., was subjected to assessment proceedings for A.Y. 2017–18. Due to non-compliance with notices issued by the Assessing Officer (AO), the assessment was completed ex-p...

Section 69A Addition Deleted: ITAT Delhi Rules WhatsApp Chat Not Sufficient Evidence of Cash Receipt – M/s Atma Ram Amart Nath vs DCIT (AY 2021-22)

Author
My Tax Expert
17/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 316
Read More »
Facts of the CaseA search and seizure action under Section 132 was conducted on the assessee. During post-search analysis, a WhatsApp chat between the partner of the assessee firm and a representative of M/s Omaxe Ltd....

Condonation of Delay – ITAT Restores Appeal to CIT(A) in Interest of Justice | Sanjay Mittal vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)

Author
My Tax Expert
17/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 228
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Sh. Sanjay Mittal, filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) against the order of the CIT(A)/NFAC dated 18.07.2024 for Assessment Year 2018-19. The assessment proce...

ITAT Delhi: Rejection of Registration u/s 12A Set Aside and Matter Restored to CIT(E) for Fresh Consideration due to Non-submission of Documents – DNightWings Young Foundation vs CIT(Exemption) (ITAT Delhi)

Author
My Tax Expert
17/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 271
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, DNightWings Young Foundation, filed an application for provisional registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 before the CIT (Exemption), Delhi.The CIT(E) rejec...

Cash Deposit Addition u/s 69A Partly Sustained – ITAT Delhi Allows Relief Where Deposits Were Explained from Earlier Cash Withdrawals | Amit Duggal vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)

Author
My Tax Expert
17/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 183
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee deposited ₹4,00,000 in cash in January 2021 in two bank accounts: ₹2,00,000 deposited in ICICI Bank on 11.01.2021 ₹2,00,000 deposited in IndusInd Bank on 04.01.2021 Du...

ITAT Delhi: Ex-Parte Order of CIT(A) Violating Natural Justice Set Aside – Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Restored for Fresh Adjudication | Fast Conversion Marketing Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs DCIT

Author
My Tax Expert
17/03/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 135
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Fast Conversion Marketing Solution Private Limited, filed its return of income for AY 2016-17 on 17.10.2016 declaring income of Rs. 1,24,49,670.The assessment was completed under section...