Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters
Banyan Real Estate Fund Mauritius vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle International Tax 1(1)(2) & Anr – Reassessment Proceedings Stayed due to Non-Application of Mind under Sections 148A(b), 148A(d) & 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of
the CaseThe present writ petition arises from reassessment proceedings
initiated by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax
Act, 1961 for AY 2016–17.The AO alleged that the ...
Dhruv Suri vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 30(5), Delhi & Anr. – Reassessment Proceedings under Section 148A(d) of Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Dhruv Suri, sold an immovable property for
₹1,20,25,000. The property had been purchased in 2010 for ₹75,45,096, partly
financed through a loan from ICICI Bank.The petitioner claime...
E. Construct FZ LLC vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. (Delhi High Court, 2023)
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, E. Construct FZ LLC, challenged
reassessment proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Department for Assessment
Year 2019–20.A notice under Section 148A(b) dated 30.03.2023 was issued
...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs Deepsons Southened | Delhi High Court | Reassessment u/s 147/148 Invalid Where Issues Already Examined in Block Assessment (AY 2000–01)
Facts of the CaseThe respondent/assessee, a partnership firm engaged in garment
retail business, filed its return declaring nil income, which was
processed under Section 143(1).Subsequently, a search under Section 132 ...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs Deepsons Southened – Reassessment under Sections 147/148 Invalid on Issues Already Examined in Block Assessment | Delhi High Court
Facts of the Case
The
assessee, a partnership firm engaged in garment retail business, filed its
return for AY 2000–01 declaring nil income.
A search
and seizure operation under Section 132 was c...
Jitender Kumar vs Income Tax Officer Ward 35(5) Delhi & Anr – Reassessment under Section 148A(d) Invalid Without Opportunity to Non-Legal Heir | Delhi High Court
Facts of the CaseThe present writ petition was filed challenging an order
passed under Section 148A(d) for Assessment Year 2016–17, initiating
reassessment proceedings against the petitioner. The reassessment was tri...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-3 vs Pawansut Holding Ltd – Protective vs Substantive Additions | AY 2012-13 & 2013-14 | Delhi High Court
Facts of the Case
The
present appeals were filed by the Revenue before the Delhi High Court
against a common order dated 14.12.2022.
The
matter pertains to Assessment Years 2012-13 and 2013-14.
...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-3 vs Pawansut Holding Ltd (Delhi High Court) | Protective vs Substantive Additions | AY 2012-13 & 2013-14
Facts of the CaseThe present appeals were filed by the Revenue before the Delhi
High Court challenging a common order dated 14.12.2022 passed by the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning Assessment Years 2012...
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-3 vs Pawansut Holding Ltd (Delhi High Court, ITA 451–452/2023, AY 2012–13 & 2013–14)
Facts of the CaseThe present appeals were filed by the Revenue challenging a common
order dated 14.12.2022 relating to Assessment Years 2012–13 and 2013–14.The Revenue sought to contest the Tribunal’s handling of ...
Shri Tarlochan Lal Goel vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Reassessment Notice Quashed Due to Erroneous ‘Reasons to Believe’ under Sections 147/148 of Income Tax Act.
Facts of the Case
The
petitioner filed the return of income on 28.02.2012, declaring
income of ₹23,66,050.
The
return was processed under Section 143(1).
A
notice under Section 148 dated...