Blog Categories
All Posts Accounting 2 Accounting Standard 12 CBDT 1 Chartered Accountant 1 Chartered Engineer 1 Greetings 1 Labour Law 2 MCA Notification 1 MSME 1 NGO- Trust & Society 0 PLACEMENT 1 Press Information Bureau, Government of India (PIB) 2 RBI & Banks 1 RERA 0 RTI 1 STUDENT ICAI 2 Virtual Webinar 7
Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,223,153
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters

Blackstone Capital Partners (Singapore) VI FDI Three Pte. Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation), Delhi (2023) – Reassessment u/s 147 & Validity of TRC under India-Singapore DTAA

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 262
Read More »
 Facts of the Case The petitioner, a Singapore-based entity, invested in shares of an Indian company (Agile Electric Sub Assembly Pvt. Ltd.) in 2013. In AY 2016–17, it sold those shares and claimed cap...

Swarovski India Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Reassessment Invalid Due to Notice on Non-Existent PAN | Sections 147, 148, 144, 271(1)(c), 271F, 272A

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 397
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Swarovski India Private Limited (formerly Swaropearl India Pvt. Ltd.), filed writ petitions challenging reassessment proceedings initiated for AY 2015–16, 2016–17, and 2017–18. ...

Swarovski India Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Reassessment Proceedings Quashed Due to Invalid PAN Usage & Procedural Lapses under Sections 147 & 148 of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 229
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner company was originally incorporated as Swaropearl India Pvt. Ltd. and later renamed as Swarovski India Pvt. Ltd. Upon name change, a new PAN was issued, replacing the old ...

Indo Laminates Pvt. Ltd. vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department & Ors. – Delhi High Court Quashes Assessment Order for Violation of Natural Justice & Section 144B SOP (AY 2021-22)

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 231
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Indo Laminates Private Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2021-22 on 15.03.2022. The case was selected for scrutiny under the Computer Assisted Scrutiny Selection...

Swarovski India Private Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Reassessment Proceedings under Section 148 Quashed Due to PAN Error & Natural Justice Violation

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 229
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Swarovski India Private Limited (formerly Swaropearl India Pvt. Ltd.), challenged reassessment proceedings initiated by the Income Tax Department for Assessment Years 2015–16, 2016â€...

Ashok Kumar Garg vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Invalid Reassessment Order Under Section 148A(d) for Ignoring Assessee’s Reply

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 275
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe petitioner challenged an order dated 30.03.2022 passed under Section 148A(d) along with a consequential notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. A show cause notice under Secti...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Sony Mobile Communications India Pvt Ltd (Now Merged with Sony India Pvt Ltd) – Assessment on Non-Existent Entity Post Amalgamation Invalid u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C | Delhi High Cour

Author
My Tax Expert
13/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 228
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe case pertains to Assessment Year 2010–11, where the assessee company, originally Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications (India) Pvt Ltd, later renamed Sony Mobile Communications (India) Pvt Ltd, w...

Cement Corporation of India Ltd. vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 5(2), New Delhi (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Recall of ITAT Ex Parte Order under Rule 24 vs Limitation under Section 254(2) of Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 319
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Cement Corporation of India Ltd., challenged the order dated 07.09.2022 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), whereby its miscellaneous application seeking recall of an ...

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 vs M/s Athena Energy Ventures Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Section 14A Disallowance Not Applicable in Absence of Exempt Income | ITA 71/2023

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 293
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present appeal was filed by the Revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 17.02.2021. The core issue pertained to disallowance of ₹3,14,71,557/- made by the Ass...

UPINDER KUMAR WANCHOO vs INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 43(6), NEW DELHI & ANR. – Delhi High Court Judgment on Reassessment u/s 148A(d) Set Aside for Non-Application of Mind (AY 2016–17)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/04/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 264
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe present writ petition pertains to Assessment Year 2016–17, wherein the petitioner challenged: Notice dated 17.02.2023 issued under Section 148A(b) Order dated 30.03.2023 passed under Section...