Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,234,649
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters

Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. JDS Apparels Private Limited: Applicability of Section 194H on Credit Card Commission

Author
My Tax Expert
14/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 193
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee, JDS Apparels Private Limited, is engaged in the business of trading readymade garments. During the assessment year 2009-10, the assessee utilized card swiping machines provided...

CIT-VI vs. Valvoline Cummins Ltd.: Reassessment Cannot Be Based on Mere Suspicion of "Unascertained Liability" Under Section 147

Author
My Tax Expert
14/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 153
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee, Valvoline Cummins Ltd., filed its return of income for the assessment year 2006-07 on November 30, 2006, declaring an income of ₹9,52,15,517. The assessment was initially co...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Jubilant Offshore Drilling Pvt Ltd: Business Commencement vs. Production Phase under Section 35D

Author
My Tax Expert
14/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 133
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee, Jubilant Offshore Drilling Pvt Ltd, was incorporated in March 2004 to engage in oil and gas exploration. During the Assessment Year 2008-09, the Assessing Officer (AO) disallow...

Naresh Trehan vs. Rakesh Kumar Gupta: Delhi High Court Ruling on Disclosure of Income Tax Returns Under RTI Act, 2005

Author
My Tax Expert
14/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 241
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent, Rakesh Kumar Gupta, acting as an informer to the Income Tax Department, filed an RTI application seeking inspection of all records and documents related to eight assessees (including Dr...

Commissioner of Income Tax-21 vs. Mr. Sarkar Nath Oberoi: Retrospective Applicability of Section 40(a)(ia) and Higher Depreciation on Commercial Vehicles

Author
My Tax Expert
14/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 130
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe appellant (Revenue) challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding two primary disputes in the assessment of the respondent (Assessee). The first dispute arose from the Assessi...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Discovery Communication India: Deductibility of Advertisement Expenses under Section 37(1)

Author
My Tax Expert
14/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 117
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee, Discovery Communication India, is a subsidiary of foreign entities and is engaged in the distribution, marketing, and production of satellite television programs for channels l...

Balasubramanian Ramachandran vs. Income Tax Officer: Reopening of Assessment Beyond Four Years Under Section 147 Without Failure to Disclose Material Facts

Author
My Tax Expert
14/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 122
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Balasubramanian Ramachandran, challenged a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 28.03.2012. This notice sought to reopen the assessment for the Assessment...

Commissioner of Income Tax-VI vs. Taikisha Engineering India Ltd.: Application of Section 14A and Rule 8D for Disallowance of Expenditure on Exempt Income

Author
My Tax Expert
13/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 178
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue filed two appeals regarding assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10. In AY 2008-09, Taikisha Engineering India Ltd. (the Respondent) declared a total taxable income of ₹31,14,68,297 a...

Commissioner of Income Tax IV vs. M/S Interarch Building Product: Treatment of Reimbursed Service Charges under Section 80-I

Author
My Tax Expert
13/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 144
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee, M/S Interarch Building Product, shared a common office space with another entity, M/s. Interarch. Due to this arrangement, the two entities shared service charges and administr...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/S Ankit Garments Manufacturing Co.: Validity of Section 263 Revision on Factual Confirmations

Author
My Tax Expert
13/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 166
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe respondent-assessee, a partnership firm manufacturing readymade garments, was subjected to search and seizure proceedings on October 16, 2007. For the assessment year 2008-09, the Assessing Officer...