Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,234,646
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters

Sanjay Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) | Section 132A, Section 158B, Section 158BC, Section 158BE & Section 158BFA(2) of Income Tax Act – Determination of Block Period in Requisition Cases and Assessment of Undisclosed Income

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 187
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee earned commission income from property transactions and trading of transistor parts and also acted as an informer for the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI). O...

Sanjay Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) | Determination of Block Period under Sections 132A, 158B, 158BC & Penalty under Section 158BFA(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 – Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 158
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Sanjay Gupta, derived income through commission in property transactions and trading activities and also worked as an informer for the Directorate of Revenue Intelligen...

Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations (CISCE) Vs. Director General of Income Tax (Exemptions) | Delhi High Court on Section 10(23C)(vi) Exemption for Educational Institutions and Surplus Generation

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 142
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner was a registered society engaged in maintaining educational standards and conducting ICSE and ISC examinations. The petitioner had previously enjoyed exemption unde...

Maruti Insurance Distribution Services Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax – Disallowance of Dealer Commission under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 158
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Maruti Insurance Distribution Services Ltd., was engaged in the business of corporate insurance agency operations through an extensive network of Maruti dealers and workshops across India...

Commissioner of Income Tax-IV (CIT) vs Narinder Kr. Budhiraja – Addition under Section 69B for Undisclosed Investment Based on Assessee’s Statement and DVO Valuation Report | Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 143
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee purchased a built-up property at FD-22, Pitampura, Delhi, measuring approximately 250 square meters. The registered sale deed disclosed consideration of ₹20 lakh paid through cheque.Subs...

Commissioner of Income Tax-IV / CIT vs Narinder Kr. Budhiraja – Addition under Section 69B for Unexplained Investment Based on Assessee's Statement and DVO Valuation Report | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 147
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee purchased a property measuring approximately 250 sq. meters at Pitampura, Delhi. Registered sale consideration disclosed was ₹20 lakhs. During examination ...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Global Associates | Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for Furnishing Inaccurate Particulars in Claim of Liquidated Damages | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 136
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed its return for Assessment Year 2008-09 and claimed deduction towards liquidated damages amounting to ₹17,24,24,025.The deduction arose from a contractual arrangement entered into w...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Global Associates | Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for Furnishing Inaccurate Particulars in Claim of Liquidated Damages | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 133
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed its return for Assessment Year 2008-09 and claimed deduction towards liquidated damages amounting to ₹17,24,24,025.The deduction arose from a contractual arrangement entered into w...

Mitsubishi Corporation India Pvt. Ltd. vs Additional Commissioner of Income Tax | Delhi High Court | Transfer Pricing Adjustment, Functional Profile & Arm's Length Price under Sections 92CA, 144C and 260A of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
19/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 243
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Mitsubishi Corporation India Pvt. Ltd., was a wholly owned subsidiary of Mitsubishi Corporation, Japan. It filed its return for Assessment Year 2006–07 declaring total income of ₹6,39...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Itochu Corporation (Delhi High Court) – Tax on Tax Paid by Employer Exempt under Section 10(10CC) and No TDS Default under Section 195

Author
My Tax Expert
18/05/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 229
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax) filed a series of appeals against the respondent-assessee, Itochu Corporation. The case primarily involved the taxability of "tax on tax" paid by an emplo...