Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
Knowledge Portal
Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.
Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Annu Kishore [2010:DHC:9962] (Delhi High Court) – Addition for Alleged Unexplained Investment in Land Cannot Be Sustained When DVO Valuation Accepted in Co-Owners' Cases
Facts of the CaseThe dispute arose from the assessment for Assessment Year
1999-2000. The assessee, Annu Kishore, was one of five co-purchasers of a
property. During assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer made a...
Ravina Khurana Vs Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi & Ors [2011:DHC:3503-DB]: Recovery of Income Tax from Restrained Foreign Bank Accounts and Scope of Review Jurisdiction Under Order XLVII Rule 1 of CPC
FACTS OF THE CASE
The
applicant, Ravina Khurana, was a Director in the corporate entity M/s
Ravina & Associates Pvt. Ltd. * On 6th March, 2006, the
Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) registered...
Ravina & Associates Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. - Scope of Review Jurisdiction under Section 260A/CPC in Income Tax Writ Proceedings: Dismissal of Re-hearing Claims in Garb of Factual Errors
Facts of the Case
The
applicant, M/s Ravina & Associates Pvt. Ltd., filed a Review
Application (RP No. 364/2011) seeking a review of the High Court’s
previous decision dated April 20, 2011, pass...
Palam Jain Educational & Welfare Society vs. Director General of Income Tax (Exemptions) | Threshold Criteria for Tax Exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi)
Facts of the Case
The
Petitioner, Palam Jain Educational & Welfare Society, is a society
registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, and manages several
unaided recognized minority scho...
Income Tax Reassessment Beyond Four Years: Validity of Section 148 Notice Without Section 151 Sanction and Independent Application of Mind - CIT vs. M/s Giesecke & Devrient India Pvt. Ltd.
Facts of the Case
The
regular assessment of the assessee for the relevant assessment year was
completed under Section 143(3) of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 on March
26, 2004.
After
a lapse of mo...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Swatch Group India Pvt. Ltd.: Full Deduction of Advertisement and Brand Promotion Expenses Under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of the Case
Assessee
Business Profile: The assessee company operates within
the highly competitive medium and high-end luxury watch segments in India.
Expenditure
Incurred: For the Asse...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M.P. Rastogi | Deletion of Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by ITAT Justified on Factual Findings of Bona Fide Claims and Absence of Concealment of Particulars of Income Even Where Quantum Disallowances Were Accepted by the Assessee
Facts of the Case
The
respondent-assessee filed their Income Tax Return for the Assessment Year
(AY) 1998-99, claiming manufacturing expenditure of ₹2,504,579 and
depreciation on plant and machinery...
Guardian Industries Corp. vs. Deputy Director of Income Tax: Withdrawal of Writ Petitions under Section 226 of the Constitution of India Post Relief Granted by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, Guardian Industries Corp.,
approached the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi by filing three separate writ
petitions: W.P.(C) No. 14213/2009, W.P.(C) No. 14214/2009, and W.P.(C)...
Guardian Industries Corp. vs. Deputy Director of Income Tax: Withdrawal of Writ Petitions under Article 226 upon Grant of Substantive Relief by the ITAT under Section 254 of the Income Tax Act
Facts of the CaseThe petitioner, Guardian Industries Corp., a foreign
corporate entity, was subjected to tax proceedings in India governed by the
provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Aggrieved by specific actions,
...
Judicial Trends on Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act: Assessing Interest Disallowance on Overdraft Capital and the Commercial Expediency of Granting Interest-Free Advances to Sister Concerns
Facts of the Case
The
Revenue filed multiple appeals spanning different assessment years against
a common assessee.
The
Assessing Officer (AO) observed that the assessee had extended
interest-...