Sponsorship Payments for ICC Brand Usage Treated as Royalty: Delhi High Court Upholds 15% TDS under Section 195 – LG Electronics India (P) Ltd. v. DIT (International Taxation) [2025]

Author
My Tax Expert
05/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 572
Read More »
The writ petition was filed by LG Electronics India (P) Ltd. challenging the order passed under Section 264 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, whereby permission sought under Section 195 for remittance of payments to Global Cr...

Stock-in-Trade of Jeweller Recorded in Books and Supported by Contemporaneous Evidence Cannot Be Seized Under Sections 132/132A – Bombay High Court Orders Unconditional Release | Mahavir Jewellers NX LLP v. DDIT (Inv.) (2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
05/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 427
Read More »
Stock-in-Trade Recorded in Books and Supported by Contemporaneous Evidence Not Liable to SeizureThe Bombay High Court held that stock-in-trade of a jeweller, duly recorded in the books of account and explained through co...

Depreciation on Block of Assets Cannot Be Denied for Non-Use of Individual Units – Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in CIT v. Kothari Sugars and Chemicals Ltd. (AY 2003-04)

Author
My Tax Expert
05/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 419
Read More »
Depreciation on Block of Assets Not Deniable Due to Non-Use of Certain Units During the Relevant Assessment YearThe Madras High Court held that depreciation allowable on a block of assets cannot be denied merely because ...

Section 68 Addition Unsustainable Where Bank Trail & PAN Established: Patna High Court in Rajnandani Projects (P) Ltd. v. PCIT (2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
04/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 925
Read More »
Background and FactsThe Assessing Officer made an addition of ₹1.91 crore under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, treating the amount as unexplained cash credit. The assessee furnished complete documentary evid...

Unproved Bank Liabilities for Unpresented Cheques Treated as Bogus Credits; SLP Dismissed by Supreme Court – Harsha Associates (P) Ltd. v. DCIT

Author
My Tax Expert
03/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 629
Read More »
The assessee filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2007-08 declaring a total income of ₹28,71,047. The return was selected for scrutiny. During the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer observed that t...

Bogus Political Donations Routed Back to Donor Not Eligible for Deduction under Section 80GGC — ITAT Ahmedabad in Rajen Jayantilal Merchant v. ITO

Author
CA DR VINAY MITTAL
02/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 2340
Read More »
The appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench, arose from an order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, confirming the reassessment made under Sectio...

Prosecution Under Section 276C(2) Quashed for Non-Payment of Self-Assessment Tax: No Willful Evasion Established – Vilas Babanrao Kalokhe v. PCIT (Central) (Bom HC, 2025)

Author
CA. NITIN GUPTA
01/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 513
Read More »
The assessee, engaged in the business of stone crushing and manufacturing precast cement pipes, filed the return of income for Assessment Year 2022-23 on 05.11.2022. The Assessing Officer observed that the assessee faile...

Ad Hoc 10% Disallowance of Travelling & Telephone Expenses Deleted: No Discrepancies in Audited Books – Spectrum Talent Management v. ACIT (ITAT Delhi, 2025)

Author
CA. NITIN GUPTA
01/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 474
Read More »
The assessee-firm, engaged in providing staffing solutions and operating in the services sector, claimed travelling and telephone expenses under Section 37(1) for the relevant assessment year. The Assessing Officer obser...

No Penalty on Wife for Non-Disclosure of Joint Foreign Investment When Husband Declares in ITR: PCIT v. Aditi Avinash Athavankar (Bom. HC, 2025)

Author
My Tax Expert
01/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 467
Read More »
For Assessment Year 2017-18, the allegation against the respondent-assessee (wife) pertained to non-disclosure of a foreign investment in Schedule FA of her income tax return. The material on record indicated that her na...

Prosecution under Section 276C(2) Quashed for Delayed Self-Assessment Tax: No Willful Evasion Established – Vilas Babanrao Kalokhe v. PCIT (Central) [2025]

Author
My Tax Expert
31/12/2025  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 520
Read More »
The assessee, engaged in stone crushing and manufacturing of precast cement pipes, filed the return of income for AY 2022-23 on 05.11.2022. The self-assessment tax payable under Section 140A was not discharged along with...