Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,220,971
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters

Commissioner of Income Tax-VI v. TEI Technology Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) – Technical Support Fee Held as Revenue Expenditure and Not Capital Expenditure | ITA Nos. 617/2010 & 618/2010

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 144
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed appeals before the Delhi High Court challenging the common order dated 28.07.2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) for Assessment Years 2004-05 and 2005-06.The dispu...

CIT vs. M/s Pepsico India Holdings (P) Ltd.: Are Neon and Glow Sign Advertising Expenditures Revenue or Capital in Nature under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act?

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 147
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue (Appellant) challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning the respondent-assessee, M/s Pepsico India Holdings (P) Ltd., for multiple assessment years. The core...

Commissioner of Income Tax-VI vs. TEI Technology Pvt. Ltd. – Whether Technical Support Fee Constitutes Revenue Expenditure or Capital Expenditure under the Income-tax Act | Delhi High Court [2010:DHC:12075-DB]

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 129
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue filed appeals against the composite order dated 28.07.2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal relating to Assessment Years 2004-05 and 2005-06. The issue...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Hutchison Essar Telecom Ltd. – Proceedings under Sections 201 & 201(1A) Barred by Limitation Beyond Four Years | Delhi High Court (2010:DHC:2043-DB)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 107
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue preferred the present appeal against a common order dated 05.03.2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). Before the Tribunal, the assessee raised a prel...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Hutchison Essar Telecom Ltd. [2010] 2010:DHC:2044-DB (Delhi High Court) – Proceedings under Sections 201 & 201(1A) Cannot Be Initiated Beyond the Reasonable Limitation Period

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 117
Read More »
Facts of the Case The Revenue filed appeals against a common order dated 05.03.2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The assessee, Hutchison Essar Telecom Ltd., raised a prelimina...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. New Palace Store: Valuation of Excess Stock Discovered During Survey Under Section 133A – Tag Price vs. Discounted Sale Price for Inventory Assessment

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 126
Read More »
Facts of the Case The respondent/assessee operates a retail business selling readymade garments. An income tax survey was conducted at the business premises of the assessee under the Income Tax Act,...

G.S. Pharmbutor Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Income Tax-IV & Another (Delhi High Court, 2010) | Reassessment under Sections 147 & 148 – Requirement of Proper Disposal of Objections by Assessing Officer

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 152
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, G.S. Pharmbutor Pvt. Ltd., had undergone regular assessments under Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Years 2003-04 and 2004-05. After ...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s. Oracle India Pvt. Ltd. (2011) — Judgment under Section 260A, Section 92, and Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 146
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s. Oracle India Pvt. Ltd., is a 100% subsidiary of Oracle Corporation, USA. The assessee imports master copies of software from its parent company, duplicates them onto blank discs, and...

Naresh Behal v. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-VIII & Others [2010] 2010:DHC:11512 (Delhi High Court) – Information Relating to Income Tax Investigation Exempt from Disclosure under Section 24 of the RTI Act

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 115
Read More »
Facts of the Case The petitioner, Naresh Behal, was married to Ms. Namrata Behal on 17 January 2000. Subsequently, matrimonial disputes arose between the parties. In proceedings before the C...

M/s KAS Movie Makers Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax-II [2010] 2010:DHC:2124-DB (Delhi High Court) – Deduction under Section 80HHF Denied Where Assessee Rendered Production Services Without Ownership or Export of Film Software

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 134
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, M/s KAS Movie Makers Pvt. Ltd., was engaged in providing professional services to foreign clients for shooting cinematographic films in India. For Assessment Ye...