Subscribe to Newsletter

Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.

Total Site Visits
1,220,897
Growing community
Clear

Knowledge Portal

Click here to explore deep insights, FAQs, and comprehensive tax guides.

Explore Now
Showing filtered results. Clear filters

Director of Income Tax vs. Sahara India Financial Corporation Ltd. [2010:DHC:1012-DB] – Whether Title Sponsorship Payment for Sahara Cup Constitutes Royalty under Article 13(3)(c) of the India-Canada DTAA

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 184
Read More »
Facts of the Case The case related to Assessment Year 1998-99. Sahara India Financial Corporation Ltd. entered into an agreement dated 10.07.1996 with IMG Canada. Under the agreement, Sahara...

Director of Income Tax vs. Sahara India Financial Corporation Ltd. [2010:DHC:1012-DB] – Whether Title Sponsorship Payment for Sahara Cup Constitutes Royalty under Article 13(3)(c) of the India-Canada DTAA

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 119
Read More »
Facts of the Case The case related to Assessment Year 1998-99. Sahara India Financial Corporation Ltd. entered into an agreement dated 10.07.1996 with IMG Canada. Under the agreement, Sahara...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Anil Kumar Sharma [2010:DHC:1138-DB] – Scope of Revision under Section 263 | Difference Between Lack of Inquiry and Inadequate Inquiry

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 107
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2003-04 on 25 November 2003 declaring total income of Rs. 1,64,06,770/-. The Assessing Off...

National Financial Reporting Authority v. Udayan Sen — Order under Section 132(4) of the Companies Act, 2013

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 122
Read More »
Facts of the Case SCN Issued: A Show Cause Notice (SCN) was issued on 17 January 2020 to CA Udayan Sen under NFRA’s powers under Section 132(4) of the Companies Act, 2013, asking him to show cause w...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Forech India Ltd. [2010:DHC:1139-DB] – Deletion of Addition on Alleged Undisclosed Stock Found During Survey | Scope of Interference with Concurrent Findings of Fact under Section 260A

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 136
Read More »
Facts of the Case The case related to Assessment Year 2000-01. During a survey conducted at the assessee's premises, the Revenue authorities noticed a discrepancy between the physical stock availabl...

Van Oord ACZ India (P) Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax [2010:DHC:1511-DB] – Scope of Tax Deduction at Source under Section 195 and Disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) on Reimbursement to Non-Resident

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 131
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Van Oord ACZ India (P) Ltd., was an Indian company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Van Oord ACZ Marine Contractors BV, Netherlands (VOAMC). The assessee was en...

Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs. Sutlej Industries Ltd. [2010:DHC:1500-DB] – Interest on Refund of Self-Assessment Tax under Section 244A(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 126
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Sutlej Industries Ltd., for Assessment Year 1998-99, had paid: Tax Deducted at Source (TDS), Advance Tax, and Self-Assessment Tax under Section 140...

Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-II vs. Leo Financial Services Ltd. [2010:DHC:1654-DB] – Scope of Revision under Section 263 in Dividend Stripping Cases and Payments Covered under Section 40A(2)(b)

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 129
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Leo Financial Services Ltd., was assessed for Assessment Year 2001-02. The Commissioner of Income Tax passed a revision order under Section 263 of the Income Ta...

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Bhartesh Jain [2010] 2010:DHC:1885-DB (Delhi High Court) – Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) Cannot Be Levied Merely on Change of Treatment of Loss or Bona Fide Explanation for Cash Credits under Section 68

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 127
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee claimed certain losses as business losses. The Assessing Officer recharacterized the same as speculation losses. The Assessing Officer also made additions under Sect...

Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s Poddar Pigments Limited – Eligibility of Interest on Delayed Realisation of Sale Proceeds for Deduction under Section 80-IB and Scope of Reassessment Proceedings under the Income-tax Act, 1961 | Delhi High Court

Author
My Tax Expert
11/06/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 111
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed an appeal before the Delhi High Court against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal relating to Assessment Year 2002-03.During reassessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer...