Addition under Section 68 on Share Capital Deleted for AY 2012-13: No Requirement to Explain Source of Source Prior to Proviso – Exotica Enclave Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 432
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Exotica Enclave Pvt. Ltd., is a private limited company engaged in the business of real estate. It filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2012-13 on 24.12.2012 declaring total in...

Reassessment under Section 147 Quashed Where Action Should Have Been Taken under Section 153C: DCIT vs. Suresh Kumar Banthia (ITAT Kolkata)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 362
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee’s original assessment for Assessment Year 2016-17 was completed under Section 143(3) read with Section 153A on 31.12.2018. A search under Section 132 was conducted on 30.11.2018 in the c...

Exemption under Section 54F Allowed Despite Prior Construction and Joint Ownership: Sale of Shares and Investment in Residential House – Saroj Goenka vs. ITO, Kolkata (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 781
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed her return of income for Assessment Year 2021-22 declaring total income of ₹1,87,69,130. During the year, she sold 36,00,000 shares of Emami Ltd. on 13.07.2020 for a total conside...

Rental Income Taxable as Income from House Property and Jurisdictional Objection Rejected under Section 124: Veerprabhu Auto Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT, Kolkata (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 316
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Veerprabhu Auto Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 declaring a loss of ₹1,46,903. During the relevant year, the assessee earned rental income of ₹9,48...

Addition under Section 56(2)(x) Deleted in Tax-Neutral Demerger: Compliance with Section 2(19AA) and Section 47(vib) Upheld – ACIT vs. Emami Realty Limited (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 464
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Emami Realty Limited, is a listed company engaged in real estate development. Pursuant to a scheme of arrangement approved by the NCLT, the real estate undertaking of Oriental Sales Age...

Reopening under Section 148 after Search Upheld and Addition Restricted to Gross Profit on Undisclosed Purchases: Shakambhari Ispat & Power Ltd. vs. DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 330
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, M/s Shakambhari Ispat & Power Ltd., filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2019-20 declaring total income of ₹17,25,39,330 under normal provisions and ₹51,82,85,619 under ...

Reopening after Post-01.04.2021 Search Upheld but Section 68 Addition on Sale of Investments Deleted for Arbitrary and Inconsistent Approach: BMS Sales Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 294
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2019-20 on 31.10.2019 declaring income under normal and MAT provisions. A search under Section 132 was conducted on 17.09.2021 on the Agarwal...

Reopening Quashed as Change of Opinion without New Tangible Material: West Bengal Electronics Industry Development Corporation Ltd. vs. CIT(A), NFAC (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 276
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a Government of West Bengal undertaking and nodal agency for development of the IT and IT-enabled services sector in the State, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2012-13 on ...

Sections 56(2)(viia) and 50D Validly Applied to Share Allotment and Sale to Group Entities: Madhur Coal Mining Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 331
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2015-16 on 29.09.2015 declaring nil income and a current year loss of ₹10,31,82,416. The case was selected for limited scrutiny under CASS ...

Deletion of Entire Bogus Purchase Addition Upheld Where Sales Accepted and Books Not Rejected: ITO, Ward-1(2), Siliguri vs. Binoy Agarwal (ITAT Kolkata)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/01/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 425
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Binoy Agarwal, is engaged in the business of trading in furnishing items and filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2021-22 on 01.03.2022 declaring total income of ₹1,33,64,769....