Reference to DVO Mandatory When Stamp Value is Disputed — ITAT Allahabad Remands Capital Gains Assessment u/s 50C(2) | Mohammad Nazim v. ITO (ITA No. 30/Alld/2023)

Author
My Tax Expert
17/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 235
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed his return declaring income including capital gains from sale of land. The case was selected for limited scrutiny due to mismatch between sale consideration reported in the return an...

Unpaid Service Tax Not Disallowable u/s 43B If No Deduction Claimed — ITAT Allahabad Deletes Addition; Partial Relief on Ad-hoc Expense Disallowances | Anil Kumar Gupta v. DCIT (ITA No. 18/Alld/2023)

Author
My Tax Expert
17/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 178
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, an individual engaged in providing security guard and manpower services, followed the mercantile system of accounting and was registered under service tax laws. During scrutiny assessment...

Ex-Parte Dismissal by CIT(A) Without Speaking Order Set Aside — ITAT Allahabad Remands Matter for Fresh Adjudication under Section 250(6) | Denial of Section 11 Exemption Due to Form 10B Issue | Acharya Dharamchandradeo Medical & Research Trust v. DCIT (CPC), ITA No. 58/Alld/2023

Author
My Tax Expert
17/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 146
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a charitable trust registered under Sections 12A and 80G of the Income-tax Act, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 15.10.2016. The return was processed under Sectio...

Ex-Parte Dismissal Without Merits Invalid under Section 250(6): ITAT Allahabad Restores Appeal in Syed Shoeb Ashraf v. ITO

Author
My Tax Expert
17/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 181
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe Assessing Officer received specific CIB information that the assessee had deposited cash amounting to ₹82,60,000 in a business bank account with Bank of Baroda during the relevant year. The asses...

CIT(A) Cannot Confirm Additions Ex-Parte Without Independent Findings: ITAT Allahabad Restores Case for Fresh Adjudication — Smt. Swatantra Mishra v. ITO

Author
My Tax Expert
17/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 143
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed a return declaring business income of ₹4,27,350. Based on AIR information, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee had deposited cash of ₹46,18,300 in multiple bank account...

Rectification under Section 154 Permissible for Exemption Claim u/s 10(38): ITAT Allahabad Restores LTCG Taxation Dispute for Fresh Examination — Dr. Aroti Ghosh v. ITO

Author
My Tax Expert
17/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 161
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee’s case was selected for scrutiny based on AIR information regarding share transactions amounting to ₹59,84,641. The return of income for AY 2008-09 was filed declaring total income of ...

Ex-Parte CIT(A) Order & Best-Judgment Assessment u/s 144 Set Aside for Lack of Proper Opportunity — ITAT Allahabad Remands Matter for De-Novo Assessment | Sanjay Kesarwani v. ITO (ITAT)

Author
My Tax Expert
17/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 301
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, an individual trader, filed appeals against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for Assessment Years 2008-09 and 2009-10, as well as against the confirmation of penalty...

Unexplained Cash Credit on Cash Deposits from Dairy Business – ITAT Delhi Partly Sustains Addition under Section 68 in Vinay Kumar vs ITO (AY 2006-07)​

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 280
Read More »
Facts of the Case The assessee, Vinay Kumar, proprietor of M/s Sunshine Enterprises, carrying on the business of sale of dairy products, had deposited cash of Rs. 12.50 lakh in his bank account during Assessment Year ...

ITAT Allahabad: Ex-Parte NFAC Order Set Aside — Matter Remanded Where Legal Grounds on Reassessment, Limitation and Section 69A Addition Not Examined | Jitendra Kesarwani vs ITO (AY 2010-11)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 206
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Jitendra Kesarwani, was subjected to reassessment proceedings after information was received regarding a cash deposit of Rs. 10,00,000 in his bank account during Financial Year 2010-11. ...

ITAT Allahabad Remands Section 69A Addition on Demonetization Cash Deposits — Agricultural Income & KCC Source to Be Verified | Mohammad Irfan Jafri vs ITO (AY 2017-18)

Author
My Tax Expert
16/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 269
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, Mohammad Irfan Jafri, did not file a return of income for Assessment Year 2017-18. During verification under “Operation Clean Money”, the Department found that the assessee had depos...