Blog Categories
Subscribe to Newsletter
Join our subscribers list to get the latest Tax Updates and Opportunities.
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax-4, New Delhi vs Indus Towers Ltd. | Delhi High Court | Section 36, 37, 32, 43B, 260A Income Tax Act | Interest, Depreciation & Loan Processing Fee Deduction Case
Facts of the
CaseThe respondent/assessee, Indus Towers Ltd.,
a public limited company, was incorporated as a joint venture of telecom
entities to provide shared telecom infrastructure services. It filed its return
de...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-II vs Amarjit Singh Bakshi (HUF) & Anr. – Delhi High Court on Mandatory Satisfaction Note under Section 158BD of Income Tax Act, 19613
Facts of the CaseThe present matter involved cross appeals between
the Revenue and the Assessee arising from a common order of the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The core issue pertained to the validity of
proc...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-II vs Amarjit Singh Bakshi (HUF) & Anr. – Delhi High Court on Mandatory Satisfaction Note under Section 158BD of Income Tax Act, 1961
Facts of the CaseThe present matter involved cross appeals between
the Revenue and the Assessee arising from a common order of the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The core issue pertained to the validity of
proc...
BDR Finvest Pvt. Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. (Delhi High Court, 2023) – TDS Credit Allowed Despite Non-Deposit by Deductor | Sections 154, 199 & 205 Income Tax Act
Facts of the
Case
The Petitioner, BDR Finvest Pvt. Ltd., advanced a loan to
Ninex Developers Ltd. during FY 2018–19 (AY 2019–20).
Interest was paid after deduction of tax at source (TDS) amounting
t...
Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-II vs Amarjit Singh Bakshi (HUF) & Anr. – Section 158BD Jurisdiction Invalid Without Satisfaction Note | Delhi High Court
Facts of the Case
The case arises from a search and seizure operation under
Section 132.
Proceedings were initiated against the assessee under Section
158BD based on documents allegedly seized from a thi...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs. Victory Apartments Pvt. Ltd. & Connected Matters (Delhi High Court) – Section 153C Proceedings Invalid in Absence of Incriminating Material
Facts of the
Case
A search under Section 132 was conducted on individuals (directors
of the assessee companies).
Proceedings under Section 153C were initiated against the
respondent companies.
The Co...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs M/s Victory Apartments Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. – Section 153C Proceedings Invalid Without Incriminating Material (Delhi High Court)
Facts of the CaseThe Revenue filed multiple appeals against
different assessees including M/s Victory Apartments Pvt. Ltd., M/s Victory
Township Pvt. Ltd., and M/s Victory Dwellings Pvt. Ltd. challenging the orde...
Ashok Kumar Aggarwal vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2, New Delhi & Ors. (Delhi High Court, 2023) – Treatment of Seized Cash as Advance Tax under Section 132B
Facts of the
Case
A search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income
Tax Act, 1961 was conducted on 15.01.2009.
Cash amounting to ₹50 lakhs was seized from the petitioner.
The petitioner file...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs Victory Apartments Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. – Section 153C Invalid Without Incriminating Material | Delhi High Court
Facts of the
Case
The Revenue filed multiple appeals against a common order passed by
the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) concerning AY 2009–10.
The Tribunal had allowed the assessee’s appeal by hold...
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 vs. M/s Victory Apartments Pvt. Ltd. & Connected Matters – Section 153C Proceedings Invalid in Absence of Incriminating Material (Delhi High Court)
Facts of the CaseThe appeals were filed by the
Revenue against multiple assessees, including M/s Victory Apartments Pvt. Ltd.,
M/s Victory Township Pvt. Ltd., and M/s Victory Dwellings Pvt. Ltd.,
challenging the order...