Mohit Anand vs ITO — ITAT Allahabad on Addition for Unexplained Cash Deposits under Section 69A, Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 179
Read More »
Facts of the CaseDuring assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer noticed substantial cash deposits in the bank account of the assessee. The assessee was required to explain the source of such deposits. Not being ...

Uma Kesharwani vs ITO — ITAT Allahabad Sets Aside Ex-Parte Appellate Order for Non-Prosecution; Mandatory Speaking Order under Section 250(6), Income-tax Act, 1961

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 176
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee was originally assessed under the scrutiny provisions of the Income-tax Act for the relevant assessment year. Subsequently, reassessment proceedings were initiated on the ground that incom...

ITAT Allahabad: Seized Cash Must Be Adjusted Against Tax Liability — Interest u/s 234B Not Leviable Beyond Return Filing Date | Suresh Chandra Purwar (HUF) v. ACIT (AY 2011-12)

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 143
Read More »
Facts of the CaseSearch and seizure operations under Section 132 were conducted on the Purwar group on 25 February 2011, during which substantial cash amounting to approximately ₹4.73 crore was seized. The assessee...

ITAT Allahabad: Appeal Dismissed as Withdrawn After Opting for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 — Shri Dinesh Kumar Pahuja v. ACIT (ITA No. 50/ALLD/2020, AY 2012-13) | Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 237
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee had filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 2 December 2019 for Assessment Year 2012-13. During the p...

Krishnapati Sewashram vs CIT(E) — ITAT Decision on Denial of Approval under Section 80G of Income-tax Act, 1961: Religious vs Charitable Purpose

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 222
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a trust engaged in activities connected with worship and related functions along with certain charitable activities, challenged the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) de...

Reassessment Based on Incorrect Cash Deposit Information Held Invalid: ITAT in Sri Late Surya Prakash Kesarwani & Anr. — Addition u/s 68 and Proceedings u/s 147/148 Quashed for Lack of Valid “Reason to Believe”

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 501
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed the return of income declaring income as per books of account. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer initiated reassessment proceedings on the basis of information suggesting that the ...

Amit Kumar Gupta vs ITO (ITAT Allahabad) — Addition Deleted on Legal Grounds under Income-tax Act, 1961: Detailed Analysis of Sections Involved

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 174
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal challenging the order passed by the lower authorities wherein certain additions/disallowances were made to the returned income duri...

Delayed Employees’ PF Contribution Paid Before Return Due Date Allowable — ITAT Allahabad in JCIT v. Bharat Pumps & Compressors Ltd. (ITA Nos. 147 & 148/2016) Interpreting Sections 36(1)(va) & 43B

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 500
Read More »
 Facts of the CaseThe assessee, a public sector undertaking engaged in manufacturing pumps and compressors, had collected employees’ contributions toward Provident Fund (PF). Certain amounts were deposited beyon...

Addition under Section 69A for Cash Deposits Deleted — ITAT Allahabad in Ajay Kumar Gupta v. ITO Holds Suspicion Cannot Substitute Evidence

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 416
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee, an individual, was subjected to assessment proceedings during which the Assessing Officer noticed substantial cash deposits in the assessee’s bank account for the relevant assessment y...

Reassessment Held Invalid Due to Lack of Jurisdiction — ITAT Allahabad in Gaya Prasad Bajaj v. ITO (ITA No. 375/2018) on Sections 147 & 148

Author
My Tax Expert
20/02/2026  |  0 COMMENTS  |  VISITOR'S COUNT: 172
Read More »
Facts of the CaseThe assessee was subjected to reassessment proceedings initiated under Sections 147 and 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the ground that income had allegedly escaped assessment. A notice under Secti...